These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27469401)
1. Enhanced cephalomedullary nail lag screw placement and intraoperative tip-apex distance measurement with a novel computer assisted surgery system. Kuhl M; Beimel C Injury; 2016 Oct; 47(10):2155-2160. PubMed ID: 27469401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does Computer-assisted Surgery Improve Lag Screw Placement During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures? Kuhl M; Beimel C Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2132-2144. PubMed ID: 32496321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of lag screw placement for the dynamic hip screw and the cephalomedullary nail. Lindsey RW; Ahmed S; Overturf S; Tan A; Gugala Z Orthopedics; 2009 Jul; 32(7):488. PubMed ID: 19634855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Kashigar A; Vincent A; Gunton MJ; Backstein D; Safir O; Kuzyk PR Bone Joint J; 2014 Aug; 96-B(8):1029-34. PubMed ID: 25086117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimising the tip-apex-distance in trochanteric femoral fracture fixation using the ADAPT-navigated technique, a longitudinal matched cohort study. Herzog J; Wendlandt R; Hillbricht S; Burgkart R; Schulz AP Injury; 2019 Mar; 50(3):744-751. PubMed ID: 30782395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is calcar referenced tip-apex distance a better predicting factor for cutting out in biaxial cephalomedullary nails than tip-apex distance? Puthezhath K; Jayaprakash C J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(3):2309499017727920. PubMed ID: 28847243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic Review of Helical Blade Versus Lag Screw Fixation for Cephalomedullary Nailing of Low-Energy Peritrochanteric Femur Fractures: There is a Difference in Cutout. Stern LC; Gorczyca JT; Kates S; Ketz J; Soles G; Humphrey CA J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Jun; 31(6):305-310. PubMed ID: 28346314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant cut-out following cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are helical blades to blame? Ibrahim I; Appleton PT; Wixted JJ; DeAngelis JP; Rodriguez EK Injury; 2019 Apr; 50(4):926-930. PubMed ID: 30885393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ng M; Shah NS; Golub I; Ciminero M; Zhai K; Kang KK; Emara AK; Piuzzi NS Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Dec; 32(8):1617-1625. PubMed ID: 34665292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted navigation for intramedullary nail fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures: A randomized, controlled trial. Lilly RJ; Koueiter DM; Graner KC; Nowinski GP; Sadowski J; Grant KD Injury; 2018 Feb; 49(2):345-350. PubMed ID: 29229219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A mathematical simulation of the tip-apex distance and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for intertrochanteric fractures reduced with lag screws. Li S; Chang SM; Jin YM; Zhang YQ; Niu WX; Du SC; Zhang LZ; Ma H Injury; 2016 Jun; 47(6):1302-8. PubMed ID: 27087281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures. Buyukdogan K; Caglar O; Isik S; Tokgozoglu M; Atilla B Injury; 2017 Feb; 48(2):414-418. PubMed ID: 27889112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving Cephalad Lag Screw Placement in the Femoral Head During Cephalomedullary Nailing Using a Novel Augmented Reality System. Konda SR; Solasz S; Derken M; Ganta A; Egol KA J Orthop Trauma; 2023 Mar; 37(3):130-134. PubMed ID: 36219771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of tip-apex distance and femoral head lag screw position on treatment outcomes of unstable intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary nails. Lee CH; Su KC; Chen KH; Pan CC; Wu YC J Int Med Res; 2018 Jun; 46(6):2128-2140. PubMed ID: 29848122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures. Ciufo DJ; Zaruta DA; Lipof JS; Judd KT; Gorczyca JT; Ketz JP J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Nov; 31(11):583-588. PubMed ID: 28827502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the usefulness of a fluoroscopic navigation system in femoral trochanteric fracture for orthopaedic residents with the conventional method. Takai H; Mizuta K; Murayama M; Nakayama D; Kii S; Hayai C; Takahashi T Injury; 2020 Aug; 51(8):1840-1845. PubMed ID: 32540179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral head lag screw position for cephalomedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis. Kuzyk PR; Zdero R; Shah S; Olsen M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Jul; 26(7):414-21. PubMed ID: 22337483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Late postoperative analysis of the tip-apex distance (TAD) in pertrochanteric fractures: is there an accommodation of the implant within the bone? Aihara LJ; Nanni RA; Carvalho MS; Zamboni C; Durigan JR; Hungria Neto JS; Mercadante MT; Christian RW; Hungria JOS Injury; 2017 Oct; 48 Suppl 4():S54-S56. PubMed ID: 29145969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy analysis of computer-assisted surgery for femoral trochanteric fracture using a fluoroscopic navigation system: Stryker ADAPT Takai H; Murayama M; Kii S; Mito D; Hayai C; Motohashi S; Takahashi T Injury; 2018 Jun; 49(6):1149-1154. PubMed ID: 29605293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breakage of cephalomedullary nailing in operative treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. von Rüden C; Hungerer S; Augat P; Trapp O; Bühren V; Hierholzer C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 25466724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]