270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27469495)
1. A multiple-image-based method to evaluate the performance of deformable image registration in the pelvis.
Saleh Z; Thor M; Apte AP; Sharp G; Tang X; Veeraraghavan H; Muren L; Deasy J
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):6172-80. PubMed ID: 27469495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The distance discordance metric-a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra- and inter-patient deformable image registration.
Saleh ZH; Apte AP; Sharp GC; Shusharina NP; Wang Y; Veeraraghavan H; Thor M; Muren LP; Rao SS; Lee NY; Deasy JO
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(3):733-46. PubMed ID: 24440838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Propagation of target and organ at risk contours in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using deformable image registration.
Thörnqvist S; Petersen JB; Høyer M; Bentzen LN; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 20831491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a commercial DIR platform for contour propagation in prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT/VMAT.
Hammers JE; Pirozzi S; Lindsay D; Kaidar-Person O; Tan X; Chen RC; Das SK; Mavroidis P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):14-25. PubMed ID: 32058663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An automated, quantitative, and case-specific evaluation of deformable image registration in computed tomography images.
Kierkels RGJ; den Otter LA; Korevaar EW; Langendijk JA; van der Schaaf A; Knopf AC; Sijtsema NM
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045026. PubMed ID: 29182154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deformable image registration for contour propagation from CT to cone-beam CT scans in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Thor M; Petersen JB; Bentzen L; Høyer M; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 21767192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a DVH overlay technique for quality assurance of deformable image registration-based dose accumulation.
Kainz K; Garcia Alvarez J; Zhong H; Lim S; Ahunbay E; Tai A; Erickson B; Lawton C; Li XA
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):611-623. PubMed ID: 34826153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose/volume-based evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration for the rectum and bladder.
Thor M; Bentzen L; Elstrøm UV; Petersen JB; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1411-6. PubMed ID: 23879649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy.
Motegi K; Tachibana H; Motegi A; Hotta K; Baba H; Akimoto T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):229-236. PubMed ID: 30592137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of deformable image registration between external beam radiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer with a 3D-printed deformable pelvis phantom.
Kadoya N; Miyasaka Y; Nakajima Y; Kuroda Y; Ito K; Chiba M; Sato K; Dobashi S; Yamamoto T; Takahashi N; Kubozono M; Takeda K; Jingu K
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 28214368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of the image registration method on the adaptive radiotherapy. A proof of the principle in a selected case of prostate IMRT.
Berenguer R; de la Vara V; Lopez-Honrubia V; Nuñez AT; Rivera M; Villas MV; Sabater S
Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():93-98. PubMed ID: 29472097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR.
Takayama Y; Kadoya N; Yamamoto T; Ito K; Chiba M; Fujiwara K; Miyasaka Y; Dobashi S; Sato K; Takeda K; Jingu K
J Radiat Res; 2017 Jul; 58(4):567-571. PubMed ID: 28158642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of rectal dose using daily megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography and deformable image registration.
Akino Y; Yoshioka Y; Fukuda S; Maruoka S; Takahashi Y; Yagi M; Mizuno H; Isohashi F; Ogawa K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(3):602-8. PubMed ID: 24074934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel approach for establishing benchmark CBCT/CT deformable image registrations in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Kim J; Kumar S; Liu C; Zhong H; Pradhan D; Shah M; Cattaneo R; Yechieli R; Robbins JR; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):8077-97. PubMed ID: 24171908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy with guaranteed local rigidity constraints.
König L; Derksen A; Papenberg N; Haas B
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Sep; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 27647456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of DIR uncertainty on prostate passive-scattering proton therapy dose accumulation.
Abe Y; Kadoya N; Arai K; Takayama Y; Kato T; Kimura K; Ono T; Nakamura T; Wada H; Kikuchi Y; Jingu K
Phys Med; 2017 Jul; 39():113-120. PubMed ID: 28625473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multivariable study of deformable image registration evaluation metrics in 4DCT of thoracic cancer patients.
Juan-Cruz C; Fast MF; Sonke JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 66(3):035019. PubMed ID: 33227717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Representing the dosimetric impact of deformable image registration errors.
Vickress J; Battista J; Barnett R; Yartsev S
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):N391-N403. PubMed ID: 28800299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam computed tomography-based dose calculation with deformable image registration using Hounsfield unit modifications.
Onozato Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Arai K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Kishi K; Umezawa R; Matsushita H; Jingu K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jun; 89(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 24685445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
