These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2746956)
1. [Plain abdominal film after contrast-enhanced CT; re-evaluation by using iohexol]. Ishii C; Toyoda K; Tada S Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 May; 34(5):599-604. PubMed ID: 2746956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical studies of a new non-ionic contrast medium--iohexol (Omnipaque)--in patients sensitive to ionic contrast medium]. Fuse H; Miyazaki K; Nakasima T; Fujita Y Hinyokika Kiyo; 1989 Feb; 35(2):371-5. PubMed ID: 2735246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral contrast media for body CT: Comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification. McNamara MM; Lockhart ME; Fineberg NS; Berland LL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 20966319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen evaluated by CT. A comparison between iohexol 350 mg I/ml and iopamidol 370 mg I/ml. Thorstensen O; Isberg B; Aspelin P Acta Radiol; 1995 Sep; 36(5):549-51. PubMed ID: 7640102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol. Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive method for the detection of bowel ischemia: computed tomography detection of absorbed iodinated contrast material. Linkous MD; Nelson MT; Mulvihill SJ; Goldberg HI Acad Radiol; 1994 Sep; 1(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 9419459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative investigation of i.v. iohexol and iopamidol: effect on renal function in low-risk outpatients undergoing CT. Dillman JR; al-Hawary M; Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Kaza R; Myles JD; Khalatbari S; Francis IR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):392-7. PubMed ID: 22268183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium. Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of an ionic (ioglicinate) with a non-ionic (iohexol) contrast medium in renal computed tomography]. Weigert F; Hartmann A; Rohde U Rontgenpraxis; 1986 May; 39(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 3523788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Proteinuria following nephroangiography. VII. Comparison between ionic monomeric, monoacidic dimeric and non-ionic contrast media in the dog. Törnquist C; Almén T; Golman K; Holtås S Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():49-52. PubMed ID: 6267893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [CT assessment of residual contrast medium in the kidney 12-24 hours after angiography]. Yamazaki H; Oi H; Matsushita M; Kim T; Inoue T Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 53(10):1160-5. PubMed ID: 8255745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Changes in renal function immediately after the angiography]. Murakami R; Tajima H; Kumazaki T Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jun; 54(7):605-12. PubMed ID: 8065882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Persistent CT nephrogram: significance in the diagnosis of contrast nephropathy--an update. Love L; Olson MC Urol Radiol; 1991; 12(4):206-8. PubMed ID: 2042273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol. Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The effects of angiographic contrast media on the aggregation and morphology of red cells in vitro]. Higashi S; Yasukochi H; Ishioka K; Toya H; Tanibe M; Koga M; Shirato M Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 49(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2798065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate. Rogers D; Sheth C; Eisenmenger L; Mignogna E; Winter T Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study on nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents for drip infused urography]. Sugaya K; Nishizawa O; Noto H; Suzuki T; Shimoda N; Miyagata S; Harada T; Tsuchida S Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jul; 38(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 1524001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Low osmolality contrast media in peripheral arteriography--clinical comparison of ioxaglate, iopamidol, iohexol and diatrizoate]. Tajima H Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov; 45(11):1407-20. PubMed ID: 4094879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Time course of biodistribution and changes in density following administration of iobitridol in rabbits. A comparative study vs iohexol. Rouleau P; Alison D; Bertrand P; Benderbous S; Havard P; Chambon C Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():49-55. PubMed ID: 8619352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]