94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27470098)
1. Snacking now or later? Individual differences in following intentions or habits explained by time perspective.
Onwezen MC; Van 't Riet J; Dagevos H; Sijtsema SJ; Snoek HM
Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():144-151. PubMed ID: 27470098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When planning is not enough: the self-regulatory effect of implementation intentions on changing snacking habits.
Tam L; Bagozzi RP; Spanjol J
Health Psychol; 2010 May; 29(3):284-292. PubMed ID: 20496982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The habitual nature of unhealthy snacking: How powerful are habits in adolescence?
De Vet E; Stok FM; De Wit JB; De Ridder DT
Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():182-7. PubMed ID: 26169248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying the 'if' for 'if-then' plans: combining implementation intentions with cue-monitoring targeting unhealthy snacking behaviour.
Verhoeven AA; Adriaanse MA; de Vet E; Fennis BM; de Ridder DT
Psychol Health; 2014; 29(12):1476-92. PubMed ID: 25099386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions.
Gardner B; Corbridge S; McGowan L
BMC Psychol; 2015; 3(1):8. PubMed ID: 25870763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The power of habits: unhealthy snacking behaviour is primarily predicted by habit strength.
Verhoeven AA; Adriaanse MA; Evers C; de Ridder DT
Br J Health Psychol; 2012 Nov; 17(4):758-70. PubMed ID: 22385098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finding the critical cue: implementation intentions to change one's diet work best when tailored to personally relevant reasons for unhealthy eating.
Adriaanse MA; de Ridder DT; de Wit JB
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 19106078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Temporal Self-Regulation Theory to understand healthy and unhealthy eating intentions and behaviour.
Evans R; Norman P; Webb TL
Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():357-364. PubMed ID: 28522307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tell Me a Story About Healthy Snacking and I Will Follow: Comparing the Effectiveness of Self-Generated Versus Message-Aided Implementation Intentions on Promoting Healthy Snacking Habits Among College Students.
Oh HJ; Larose R
Health Commun; 2015; 30(10):962-74. PubMed ID: 25256795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Autonomy-Framed and Control-Framed Implementation Intentions on Snacking Behaviour: The Moderating Effect of Eating Self-Efficacy.
Churchill S; Pavey L; Sparks P
Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2019 Mar; 11(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 30302915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Snacks and The City: Unexpected Low Sales of an Easy-Access, Tasty, and Healthy Snack at an Urban Snacking Hotspot.
Schlinkert C; Gillebaart M; Benjamins J; Poelman MP; de Ridder D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33081280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing and comparing the short-term effects of TPB only and TPB plus implementation intentions interventions on snacking behavior in Iranian adolescent girls: a cluster randomized trial.
Karimi-Shahanjarini A; Rashidian A; Omidvar N; Majdzadeh R
Am J Health Promot; 2013; 27(3):152-61. PubMed ID: 23286591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emphasizing the losses or the gains: Comparing situational and individual moderators of framed messages to promote fruit and vegetable intake.
Godinho CA; Alvarez MJ; Lima ML
Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():416-425. PubMed ID: 26455312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mind the Gap? An Intensive Longitudinal Study of Between-Person and Within-Person Intention-Behavior Relations.
Inauen J; Shrout PE; Bolger N; Stadler G; Scholz U
Ann Behav Med; 2016 Aug; 50(4):516-22. PubMed ID: 26801785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The SNAPSHOT study protocol: SNAcking, Physical activity, Self-regulation, and Heart rate Over Time.
McMinn D; Allan JL
BMC Public Health; 2014 Sep; 14():1006. PubMed ID: 25261200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. It's the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life.
Schüz B; Schüz N; Ferguson SG
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():149. PubMed ID: 26643690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visualising future behaviour: Effects for snacking on biscuit bars, but no effects for snacking on fruit.
Adams C; Rennie L; Uskul AK; Appleton KM
J Health Psychol; 2015 Aug; 20(8):1037-48. PubMed ID: 24217063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are diet-specific compensatory health beliefs predictive of dieting intentions and behaviour?
Radtke T; Kaklamanou D; Scholz U; Hornung R; Armitage CJ
Appetite; 2014 May; 76():36-43. PubMed ID: 24472827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planning what not to eat: ironic effects of implementation intentions negating unhealthy habits.
Adriaanse MA; van Oosten JM; de Ridder DT; de Wit JB; Evers C
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 37(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 21177875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spontaneous implementation intentions and impulsivity: can impulsivity moderate the effectiveness of planning strategies?
Churchill S; Jessop D
Br J Health Psychol; 2010 Sep; 15(Pt 3):529-41. PubMed ID: 19878619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
