These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27471414)

  • 1. Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Voronov LI; Siemionow KB; Havey RM; Carandang G; Phillips FM; Patwardhan AG
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2016; 9():223-30. PubMed ID: 27471414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of DTRAX(®) posterior cervical cage stabilization with and without lateral mass fixation.
    Voronov LI; Siemionow KB; Havey RM; Carandang G; Patwardhan AG
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2016; 9():285-90. PubMed ID: 27601934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinetic analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion supplemented with transarticular facet screws.
    Traynelis VC; Sherman J; Nottmeier E; Singh V; McGilvray K; Puttlitz CM; Leahy PD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 May; 20(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 24559463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of cervical zero profile integrated cage with and without supplemental posterior Interfacet stabilization.
    Havey RM; Blank KR; Khayatzadeh S; Muriuki MG; Pappu S; Patwardhan AG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Aug; 78():105078. PubMed ID: 32585556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.
    Nayak AN; Stein MI; James CR; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Adu-Lartey M; Castellvi AE; Santoni BG
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3002-10. PubMed ID: 24948039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads.
    Phillips FM; Cunningham B; Carandang G; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov L; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1731-6. PubMed ID: 15303015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
    Healy AT; Sundar SJ; Cardenas RJ; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Francis TB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cage-screw and anterior plating combination reduces the risk of micromotion and subsidence in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-a finite element study.
    Lin M; Shapiro SZ; Doulgeris J; Engeberg ED; Tsai CT; Vrionis FD
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):874-882. PubMed ID: 33460810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion alone or combined cervical fixations in treating compression-extension injury with unilateral facet joint fracture: a finite element study.
    Jin C; Wang Z; Liu P; Liu Y; Wang Z; Xie N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(1):938. PubMed ID: 34758793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):845-9. PubMed ID: 15082982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous fusion device and bilateral pedicle screw system as additional fixation for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 25577548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study.
    Pereira BA; Heller JE; Lehrman JN; Sawa AGU; Kelly BP
    Neurospine; 2021 Mar; 18(1):188-196. PubMed ID: 33819945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants.
    Tsantrizos A; Baramki HG; Zeidman S; Steffen T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(15):1899-907. PubMed ID: 10908932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.