195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27472278)
1. Incorporating and Compensating Cerebrospinal Fluid in Surface-Based Forward Models of Magneto- and Electroencephalography.
Stenroos M; Nummenmaa A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159595. PubMed ID: 27472278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed.
Stenroos M; Sarvas J
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3517-35. PubMed ID: 22581305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography.
Stenroos M; Hunold A; Haueisen J
Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():337-348. PubMed ID: 24434678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
Stenroos M; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generalized head models for MEG/EEG: boundary element method beyond nested volumes.
Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1333-46. PubMed ID: 16481698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapidly recomputable EEG forward models for realistic head shapes.
Ermer JJ; Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leah RM
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1265-81. PubMed ID: 11324964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Solving the MEG and the Combined MEG/EEG Forward Problem.
Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Bornfleth H; Oostenveld R; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():30. PubMed ID: 29456487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling of post-surgical brain and skull defects in the EEG inverse problem with the boundary element method.
Bénar CG; Gotman J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 113(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 11801424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
