These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27472278)

  • 21. Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.
    Nielsen JD; Madsen KH; Puonti O; Siebner HR; Bauer C; Madsen CG; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():587-598. PubMed ID: 29518567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayesian model selection of template forward models for EEG source reconstruction.
    Strobbe G; van Mierlo P; De Vos M; Mijović B; Hallez H; Van Huffel S; López JD; Vandenberghe S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jun; 93 Pt 1():11-22. PubMed ID: 24582919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anatomically constrained minimum variance beamforming applied to EEG.
    Murzin V; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 214(4):515-28. PubMed ID: 21915671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
    Irimia A; Van Horn JD; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2464-74. PubMed ID: 21959078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.
    Malmivuo JA; Suihko VE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 15248545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Integral equations and boundary-element solution for static potential in a general piece-wise homogeneous volume conductor.
    Stenroos M
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(22):N606-N617. PubMed ID: 27779140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anisotropic partial volume CSF modeling for EEG source localization.
    Hyde DE; Duffy FH; Warfield SK
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):2161-70. PubMed ID: 22652021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fast multipole acceleration of the MEG/EEG boundary element method.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4695-710. PubMed ID: 16177498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing the effects of head modelling errors and measurement noise on EEG source localization accuracy in preterm newborns: A single-subject study.
    Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Kazemi K; Wallois F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Aug; 58(3):2746-2765. PubMed ID: 37448164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The FieldTrip-SimBio pipeline for EEG forward solutions.
    Vorwerk J; Oostenveld R; Piastra MC; Magyari L; Wolters CH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Mar; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 29580236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling.
    Fuchs M; Drenckhahn R; Wischmann HA; Wagner M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):980-97. PubMed ID: 9691573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of sutures and fontanels on MEG and EEG source analysis in a realistic infant head model.
    Lew S; Sliva DD; Choe MS; Grant PE; Okada Y; Wolters CH; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():282-93. PubMed ID: 23531680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method.
    Tissari S; Rahola J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Nov; 72(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 14554135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A finite-element reciprocity solution for EEG forward modeling with realistic individual head models.
    Ziegler E; Chellappa SL; Gaggioni G; Ly JQM; Vandewalle G; André E; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():542-551. PubMed ID: 25204867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.