315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27473092)
1. Effect of Planned Mode of Delivery in Women with Advanced Maternal Age.
Lavecchia M; Sabbah M; Abenhaim HA
Matern Child Health J; 2016 Nov; 20(11):2318-2327. PubMed ID: 27473092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.
Liu S; Liston RM; Joseph KS; Heaman M; Sauve R; Kramer MS;
CMAJ; 2007 Feb; 176(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 17296957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maternal short-term complications after planned cesarean delivery without medical indication: A registry-based study.
Otkjaer AM; Jørgensen HL; Clausen TD; Krebs L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):905-912. PubMed ID: 30698280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maternal request cesarean versus planned spontaneous vaginal delivery: maternal morbidity and short term outcomes.
Wax JR
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):247-52. PubMed ID: 17011394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome.
Bjørstad AR; Irgens-Hansen K; Daltveit AK; Irgens LM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 20235897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Yearly trends in caesarean section and cesarean mortality at Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Okonofua FE; Makinde ON; Ayangade SO
Trop J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988; 1(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 12179273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scheduled cesarean delivery: maternal and neonatal risks in primiparous women in a community hospital setting.
Quiroz LH; Chang H; Blomquist JL; Okoh YK; Handa VL
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 19021093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor.
Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Goss AR; Alvarez MD; Reese C; Edwards RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):700.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24956550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Planned vaginal delivery and cardiovascular morbidity in pregnant women with heart disease.
Easter SR; Rouse CE; Duarte V; Hynes JS; Singh MN; Landzberg MJ; Valente AM; Economy KE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 222(1):77.e1-77.e11. PubMed ID: 31310750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mode of delivery for breech presentation in grandmultiparous women.
Kumari AS; Grundsell H
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Jun; 85(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 15145257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neonatal and maternal outcomes in twin gestations > or =32 weeks according to the planned mode of delivery.
Haest KM; Roumen FJ; Nijhuis JG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Nov; 123(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16260335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Labour in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Grabowska K; Stapińska-Syniec A; Saletra A; Jarmużek P; Bomba-Opoń D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 28326517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Birth outcomes following cesarean delivery on maternal request: a population-based cohort study.
Guo Y; Murphy MSQ; Erwin E; Fakhraei R; Corsi DJ; White RR; Harvey ALJ; Gaudet LM; Walker MC; Wen SW; El-Chaâr D
CMAJ; 2021 May; 193(18):E634-E644. PubMed ID: 33941522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indications for Emergency Intervention, Mode of Delivery, and the Childbirth Experience.
Handelzalts JE; Waldman Peyser A; Krissi H; Levy S; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169132. PubMed ID: 28046019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is a planned cesarean necessary in twin pregnancies?
Vendittelli F; Rivière O; Crenn-Hébert C; Riethmuller D; Schaal JP; Dreyfus M;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Oct; 90(10):1147-56. PubMed ID: 21426308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
