319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27473284)
1. Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room?
Shaw AG; Sim K; Powell E; Cornwell E; Cramer T; McClure ZE; Li MS; Kroll JS
Microbiome; 2016 Jul; 4(1):40. PubMed ID: 27473284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.
Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in Microbiota Profiles After Prolonged Frozen Storage of Stool Suspensions.
Dorsaz S; Charretier Y; Girard M; Gaïa N; Leo S; Schrenzel J; Harbarth S; Huttner B; Lazarevic V
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():77. PubMed ID: 32185143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool.
Flores R; Shi J; Yu G; Ma B; Ravel J; Goedert JJ; Sinha R
Microbiome; 2015; 3():33. PubMed ID: 26269741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.
Ribeiro RM; Souza-Basqueira M; Oliveira LC; Salles FC; Pereira NB; Sabino EC
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2018 Nov; 60():e77. PubMed ID: 30517247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of the fecal microbiota using high-throughput sequencing reveals a stable microbial community during storage.
Carroll IM; Ringel-Kulka T; Siddle JP; Klaenhammer TR; Ringel Y
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46953. PubMed ID: 23071673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.
Choo JM; Leong LE; Rogers GB
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16350. PubMed ID: 26572876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gut microbiome comparability of fresh-frozen versus stabilized-frozen samples from hospitalized patients using 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
Ilett EE; Jørgensen M; Noguera-Julian M; Daugaard G; Murray DD; Helleberg M; Paredes R; Lundgren J; Sengeløv H; MacPherson C
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13351. PubMed ID: 31527823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of freezing on faecal microbiota as determined using MiSeq sequencing and culture-based investigations.
Fouhy F; Deane J; Rea MC; O'Sullivan Ó; Ross RP; O'Callaghan G; Plant BJ; Stanton C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119355. PubMed ID: 25748176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of Specimen Collection Methodologies and Storage Conditions on the Short-Term Stability of Oral Microbiome Taxonomy.
Luo T; Srinivasan U; Ramadugu K; Shedden KA; Neiswanger K; Trumble E; Li JJ; McNeil DW; Crout RJ; Weyant RJ; Marazita ML; Foxman B
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 82(18):5519-29. PubMed ID: 27371581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Freezing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction affects the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio determined by downstream quantitative PCR analysis.
Bahl MI; Bergström A; Licht TR
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2012 Apr; 329(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 22325006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples.
Sjöberg F; Nookaew I; Yazdanshenas S; Gio-Batta M; Adlerberth I; Wold AE
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Oct; 177():106018. PubMed ID: 32795633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile.
Chiu O; Gomez DE; Obrego D; Dunfield K; MacNicol JL; Liversidge B; Verbrugghe A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0292731. PubMed ID: 38285680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
