These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2747393)
21. Rehabilitation of patients with conductive hearing loss and moderate mental retardation by means of a bone-anchored hearing aid. Kunst SJ; Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 16788427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap. de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery. Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino. Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 127(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17762993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment. Hol MK; Spath MA; Krabbe PF; van der Pouw CT; Snik AF; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Apr; 130(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 15096420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery. Linder T; Schlegel C; DeMin N; van der Westhuizen S Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18849883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Bone conduction hearing aids with fluid medium]. Siegert R; Rohweder R; Witte J; Weerda H Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):244-8. PubMed ID: 9324865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Management of single-sided deafness with the bone-anchored hearing aid. Yuen HW; Bodmer D; Smilsky K; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 141(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19559952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Can audiometric results predict qualitative hearing improvements in bone-anchored hearing aid recipients? McNeil ML; Gulliver M; Morris DP; Makki FM; Bance M J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Jan; 128(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24330750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A middle ear implant with a titanium canal wall prosthesis for a case of an open mastoid cavity. Deveze A; Rameh C; Sanjuan M; Lavieille JP; Magnan J Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Oct; 37(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 20167445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the "snap" abutment. Verstraeten N; Zarowski AJ; Somers T; Riff D; Offeciers EF Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 18957902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Branemarck bone-anchored implants for the adaptation of conductive hearing aids]. Aguado Blass F; Antoli Candela Cano F Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1990; 41(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 2261221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction. Saunders GH; Forsline A Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rehabilitation of high-frequency hearing loss with the RetroX auditory implant. Garin P; Genard F; Galle C; Fameree MH; Jamart J; Gersdorff M B-ENT; 2005; 1(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15999671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital hearing aids for high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss: preliminary experience with the RetroX device. Barbara M; Bandiera G; Serra B; Marrone V; Tarentini S; Pinna JC; Ronchetti F; Graziadio M; Monini S Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 16012028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The evidence base for the application of contralateral bone anchored hearing aids in acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in adults. Baguley DM; Bird J; Humphriss RL; Prevost AT Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 31(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 16441794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The ti-epiplating system in bone anchored hearing AIDS]. Hölzl M; Caffier P; Jungk J; Scherer H; Schrom T Laryngorhinootologie; 2007 Mar; 86(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 17133284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]