These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27474140)

  • 1. What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science.
    Patil P; Peng RD; Leek JT
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Jul; 11(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 27474140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
    Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: recommendations for research and educational practice.
    Funder DC; Levine JM; Mackie DM; Morf CC; Sansone C; Vazire S; West SG
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 Feb; 18(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 24214149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction Interval: What to Expect When You're Expecting … A Replication.
    Spence JR; Stanley DJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162874. PubMed ID: 27644090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. There's more than one way to conduct a replication study: Beyond statistical significance.
    Anderson SF; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 26214497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality science from quality measurement: The role of measurement type with respect to replication and effect size magnitude in psychological research.
    Kornbrot DE; Wiseman R; Georgiou GJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192808. PubMed ID: 29432479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1515-1539. PubMed ID: 28936638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cultural Change Over Time: Why Replicability Should Not Be the Gold Standard in Psychological Science.
    Greenfield PM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Sep; 12(5):762-771. PubMed ID: 28972841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quo Vadis, Methodology? The Key Role of Manipulation Checks for Validity Control and Quality of Science.
    Fiedler K; McCaughey L; Prager J
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2021 Jul; 16(4):816-826. PubMed ID: 33440127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
    Open Science Collaboration
    Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):aac4716. PubMed ID: 26315443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the Political Slant of Psychology Research Related to Scientific Replicability?
    Reinero DA; Wills JA; Brady WJ; Mende-Siedlecki P; Crawford JT; Van Bavel JJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Nov; 15(6):1310-1328. PubMed ID: 32812848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.
    Shrout PE; Rodgers JL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2018 Jan; 69():487-510. PubMed ID: 29300688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology.
    Boyce V; Mathur M; Frank MC
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Nov; 10(11):231240. PubMed ID: 38026006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?
    Pawel S; Heyard R; Micheloud C; Held L
    Elife; 2024 May; 12():. PubMed ID: 38739437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Replications in Comparative Cognition: What Should We Expect and How Can We Improve?
    Farrar BG; Boeckle M; Clayton NS
    Anim Behav Cogn; 2020 Feb; 7(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 32626823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.
    Murayama K; Pekrun R; Fiedler K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 May; 18(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 23965303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.
    Camerer CF; Dreber A; Holzmeister F; Ho TH; Huber J; Johannesson M; Kirchler M; Nave G; Nosek BA; Pfeiffer T; Altmejd A; Buttrick N; Chan T; Chen Y; Forsell E; Gampa A; Heikensten E; Hummer L; Imai T; Isaksson S; Manfredi D; Rose J; Wagenmakers EJ; Wu H
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Sep; 2(9):637-644. PubMed ID: 31346273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.
    Etz A; Vandekerckhove J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149794. PubMed ID: 26919473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
    Kunert R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian prediction intervals for assessing P-value variability in prospective replication studies.
    Vsevolozhskaya O; Ruiz G; Zaykin D
    Transl Psychiatry; 2017 Dec; 7(12):1271. PubMed ID: 29217835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.