These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27474194)
1. Can a virtual supermarket bring realism into the lab? Comparing shopping behavior using virtual and pictorial store representations to behavior in a physical store. van Herpen E; van den Broek E; van Trijp HCM; Yu T Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():196-207. PubMed ID: 27474194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immersive virtual reality technology in a three-dimensional virtual simulated store: Investigating telepresence and usability. Schnack A; Wright MJ; Holdershaw JL Food Res Int; 2019 Mar; 117():40-49. PubMed ID: 30736922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The association between the "Plate it Up Kentucky" supermarket intervention and changes in grocery shopping practices among rural residents. Gustafson A; Ng SW; Jilcott Pitts S Transl Behav Med; 2019 Oct; 9(5):865-874. PubMed ID: 31570920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of a price discount and consumer education strategy on food and beverage purchases in remote Indigenous Australia: a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. Brimblecombe J; Ferguson M; Chatfield MD; Liberato SC; Gunther A; Ball K; Moodie M; Miles E; Magnus A; Mhurchu CN; Leach AJ; Bailie R; Lancet Public Health; 2017 Feb; 2(2):e82-e95. PubMed ID: 29253401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using a 3D virtual supermarket to measure food purchase behavior: a validation study. Waterlander WE; Jiang Y; Steenhuis IH; Ni Mhurchu C J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e107. PubMed ID: 25921185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consumers' food selection behaviors in three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality. Siegrist M; Ung CY; Zank M; Marinello M; Kunz A; Hartmann C; Menozzi M Food Res Int; 2019 Mar; 117():50-59. PubMed ID: 30736923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Food bundling as a health nudge: Investigating consumer fruit and vegetable selection using behavioral economics. Carroll KA; Samek A; Zepeda L Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():237-248. PubMed ID: 29137968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using a Virtual Store As a Research Tool to Investigate Consumer In-store Behavior. Ploydanai K; van den Puttelaar J; van Herpen E; van Trijp H J Vis Exp; 2017 Jul; (125):. PubMed ID: 28784959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of financial incentives on participants' food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial. Olstad DL; Crawford DA; Abbott G; McNaughton SA; Le HN; Ni Mhurchu C; Pollard C; Ball K Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Aug; 14(1):115. PubMed ID: 28841892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of nudging and pricing on healthy food purchasing behavior in a virtual supermarket setting: a randomized experiment. Hoenink JC; Mackenbach JD; Waterlander W; Lakerveld J; van der Laan N; Beulens JWJ Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Aug; 17(1):98. PubMed ID: 32746928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shopping for fruits and vegetables. Food and retail qualities of importance to low-income households at the grocery store. Webber CB; Sobal J; Dollahite JS Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 19961886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice architecture modifies fruit and vegetable purchasing in a university campus grocery store: time series modelling of a natural experiment. Walmsley R; Jenkinson D; Saunders I; Howard T; Oyebode O BMC Public Health; 2018 Oct; 18(1):1149. PubMed ID: 30285680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shifting toward a healthier dietary pattern through nudging and pricing strategies: A secondary analysis of a randomized virtual supermarket experiment. Stuber JM; Hoenink JC; Beulens JWJ; Mackenbach JD; Lakerveld J Am J Clin Nutr; 2021 Aug; 114(2):628-637. PubMed ID: 33829225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discounts on fruit and vegetables combined with a space management intervention increased sales in supermarkets. Toft U; Winkler LL; Mikkelsen BE; Bloch P; Glümer C Eur J Clin Nutr; 2017 Apr; 71(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 28145417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of a 25% discount on fruits and vegetables: results of a randomized trial in a three-dimensional web-based supermarket. Waterlander WE; Steenhuis IH; de Boer MR; Schuit AJ; Seidell JC Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2012 Feb; 9():11. PubMed ID: 22316357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The virtual supermarket: an innovative research tool to study consumer food purchasing behaviour. Waterlander WE; Scarpa M; Lentz D; Steenhuis IH BMC Public Health; 2011 Jul; 11():589. PubMed ID: 21787391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Looking is buying. How visual attention and choice are affected by consumer preferences and properties of the supermarket shelf. Gidlöf K; Anikin A; Lingonblad M; Wallin A Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():29-38. PubMed ID: 28433775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Healthy choice architecture in the supermarket: Does it work? Thorndike AN Soc Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 266():113459. PubMed ID: 33127172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deception and Shopping Behavior Among Current Cigarette Smokers: A Web-Based, Randomized Virtual Shopping Experiment. Dutra LM; Nonnemaker J; Taylor N; Kim AE JMIR Res Protoc; 2018 Jun; 7(6):e10468. PubMed ID: 29959114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Natural Experiment: Using Immersive Technologies to Study the Impact of "All-Natural" Labeling on Perceived Food Quality, Nutritional Content, and Liking. Liu R; Hooker NH; Parasidis E; Simons CT J Food Sci; 2017 Mar; 82(3):825-833. PubMed ID: 28178361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]