These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27474371)

  • 1. Through experience to boldness? Deactivation of neophobia towards novel and aposematic prey in three European species of tits (Paridae).
    Adamová-Ježová D; Hospodková E; Fuchsová L; Štys P; Exnerová A
    Behav Processes; 2016 Oct; 131():24-31. PubMed ID: 27474371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey.
    Hämäläinen L; Mappes J; Rowland HM; Teichmann M; Thorogood R
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 May; 89(5):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 32077104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ability of lizards to identify an artificial Batesian mimic.
    Beneš J; Veselý P
    Zoology (Jena); 2017 Aug; 123():46-52. PubMed ID: 28716358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of social learning on avoidance of aposematic prey in juvenile great tits (Parus major).
    Landová E; Hotová Svádová K; Fuchs R; Štys P; Exnerová A
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):855-866. PubMed ID: 28639012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personality matters: individual variation in reactions of naive bird predators to aposematic prey.
    Exnerová A; Svádová KH; Fucíková E; Drent P; Stys P
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Mar; 277(1682):723-8. PubMed ID: 19889698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seeing red? Colour biases of foraging birds are context dependent.
    Teichmann M; Thorogood R; Hämäläinen L
    Anim Cogn; 2020 Sep; 23(5):1007-1018. PubMed ID: 32621272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Egg recognition abilities of tit species in the Paridae family: do Indomalayan tits exhibit higher recognition than Palearctic tits?
    Liu JP; Zhang L; Zhang L; Yang CC; Yao CT; Lu X; Møller AP; Wan DM; Liang W
    Zool Res; 2020 Nov; 41(6):726-733. PubMed ID: 32918406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey.
    Gamberale G; Tullberg BS
    Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Object permanence in the food-storing coal tit (Periparus ater) and the non-storing great tit (Parus major): Is the mental representation required?
    Marhounová L; Frynta D; Fuchs R; Landová E
    J Comp Psychol; 2017 May; 131(2):115-127. PubMed ID: 28263620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of body size in predator recognition by untrained birds.
    Beránková J; Veselý P; Fuchs R
    Behav Processes; 2015 Nov; 120():128-34. PubMed ID: 26449315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual illusions in predator-prey interactions: birds find moving patterned prey harder to catch.
    Hämäläinen L; Valkonen J; Mappes J; Rojas B
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Sep; 18(5):1059-68. PubMed ID: 25947086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis of hissing calls in five tit species.
    Zhang L; Liu J; Gao Z; Zhang L; Wan D; Liang W; Møller AP
    Behav Processes; 2020 Feb; 171():104029. PubMed ID: 31899274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of interspecific coexistence on laying date and clutch size in two closely related species of hole-nesting birds.
    Møller AP; Balbontín J; Dhondt AA; Remeš V; Adriaensen F; Biard C; Camprodon J; Cichoń M; Doligez B; Dubiec A; Eens M; Eeva T; Goodenough AE; Gosler AG; Gustafsson L; Heeb P; Hinsley SA; Jacob S; Juškaitis R; Laaksonen T; Leclercq B; Massa B; Mazgajski TD; Nager RG; Nilsson JÅ; Nilsson SG; Norte AC; Pinxten R; Robles H; Solonen T; Sorace A; van Noordwijk AJ; Lambrechts MM
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Nov; 87(6):1738-1748. PubMed ID: 30101503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug.
    Sillén-Tullberg B
    Oecologia; 1985 Oct; 67(3):411-415. PubMed ID: 28311576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(16):9181-4. PubMed ID: 11459937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To graze or gorge: consistency and flexibility of individual foraging tactics in tits.
    Milligan ND; Radersma R; Cole EF; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jul; 86(4):826-836. PubMed ID: 28191628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of an avian top predator to selection in prey species.
    Vedder O; Bouwhuis S; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 24028434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.