These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27475783)

  • 1. Measurement and modelling the sensitivity of tetrapolar transfer impedance measurements.
    Naydenova E; Cavendish S; Wilson AJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Oct; 38(10):1090-9. PubMed ID: 27475783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The sensitivity of focused electrical impedance measurements.
    Islam N; Siddique-e Rabbani K; Wilson A
    Physiol Meas; 2010 Aug; 31(8):S97-109. PubMed ID: 20647612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical sensitivity modeling for the detection of skin tumors by using tetrapolar probe.
    Ramos A; Bertemes-Filho P
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2011 Dec; 30(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 22047461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stand-off electrode (SoE): a new method for improving the sensitivity distribution of a tetrapolar probe.
    Bertemes-Filho P; Brown BH; Smallwood RH; Wilson AJ
    Physiol Meas; 2003 May; 24(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 12812435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
    Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new six-electrode electrical impedance technique for probing deep organs in the human body.
    Roy SK; Karal MAS; Kadir MA; Rabbani KS
    Eur Biophys J; 2019 Dec; 48(8):711-719. PubMed ID: 31529144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of Tetrapolar Impedance Electrodes in Microfluidic Devices for Point of Care Diagnostics using Finite Element Modeling.
    Hantschke M; Sideris D; Panayiotis Kyriacou A; Triantis AIF
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5321-5324. PubMed ID: 30441538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjacent stimulation and measurement patterns considered harmful.
    Adler A; Gaggero PO; Maimaitijiang Y
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):731-44. PubMed ID: 21646709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Addition of internal electrodes is beneficial for focused bioimpedance measurements in the lung.
    Orschulik J; Hochhausen N; Czaplik M; Teichmann D; Leonhardt S; Walter M
    Physiol Meas; 2018 Mar; 39(3):035009. PubMed ID: 29406309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity study and optimization of a 3D electric impedance tomography prostate probe.
    Borsic A; Halter R; Wan Y; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S1-18. PubMed ID: 19491445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation.
    Butson CR; Maks CB; McIntyre CC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 16376143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design of Bio-Impedance Electrode Topologies for Specific Depth Sensing in Skin Layer.
    Park M; Eom K; Jung MH; Park YS; Lee JY; Nam SH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3961-3964. PubMed ID: 33018867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrode contact impedance sensitivity to variations in geometry.
    Cardu R; Leong PH; Jin CT; McEwan A
    Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 22531168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cell for measurements of biological tissue complex conductivity.
    Wtorek J; Poliñski A; Stelter J; Nowakowski A
    Technol Health Care; 1998 Sep; 6(2-3):177-93. PubMed ID: 9839863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection Limits of Tetrapolar Impedance Sensors for Tissue Differentiation.
    Veil C; Makni O; Somers P; Schule J; Tarin C; Sawodny O
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():1-4. PubMed ID: 36085873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-invasive assessment of corneal endothelial permeability by means of electrical impedance measurements.
    Guimera A; Ivorra A; Gabriel G; Villa R
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Dec; 32(10):1107-15. PubMed ID: 20832346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examination of impedance cardiography properties--FEM model studies.
    Wtorek J; Poliński A
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():77-82. PubMed ID: 7654988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design of electrode array for impedance measurement of lesions in arteries.
    Cho S; Thielecke H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S19-26. PubMed ID: 15798232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.