These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27476094)

  • 41. Three-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Final results of the ABSORB EXTEND trial.
    Costa JR; Abizaid A; Whitbourn R; Serruys PW; Jepson N; Steinwender C; Stuteville M; Ediebah D; Sudhir K; Bartorelli AL;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 93(1):E1-E7. PubMed ID: 30286520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Early outcome of magnesium bioresorbable scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndrome-the initial report from the Magmaris-ACS registry.
    Wlodarczak A; Lanocha M; Jastrzebski A; Pecherzewski M; Szudrowicz M; Jastrzebski W; Nawrot J; Lesiak M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):E287-E292. PubMed ID: 30537203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A hybrid strategy with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug eluting stents for treating complex coronary lesions.
    Jabbour RJ; Ielasi A; Tanaka A; Leoncini M; Cortese B; Grigis G; Mitomo S; Regazzoli D; Di Palma G; Rapetto C; Tespili M; Colombo A; Latib A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(5S1):S4-S9. PubMed ID: 28314675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Optical coherence tomography evaluation and clinical outcomes.
    Kochman J; Tomaniak M; Pietrasik A; Kołtowski Ł; Rdzanek A; Huczek Z; Mazurek T; Jąkała J; Ząbek A; Legutko J; Kochman W; Filipiak KJ
    Cardiol J; 2015; 22(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 25428734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1400-11. PubMed ID: 25523532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mid-term clinical outcomes of ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in a real-world population: A single-center experience.
    Costopoulos C; Crowson MC; Brown AJ; Braganza DM; Bennett MR; Hoole SP; West NE
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Dec; 16(8):461-4. PubMed ID: 26440767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Randomized Comparison Between Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Stent: Multimodality Imaging Through 3 Years.
    Onuma Y; Honda Y; Asano T; Shiomi H; Kozuma K; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Hanaoka KI; Tanabe K; Okada K; Kitahara H; Ono M; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Simonton C; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Fitzgerald PJ; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 13(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 31918929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Incidence and Potential Mechanism(s) of Post-Procedural Rise of Cardiac Biomarker in Patients With Coronary Artery Narrowing After Implantation of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold or Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent.
    Ishibashi Y; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Suwannasom P; Grundeken MJ; Cho YK; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Boven AJ; Piek JJ; Sabaté M; Helqvist S; Baumbach A; McClean D; de Sousa Almeida M; Wasungu L; Miquel-Hebert K; Dudek D; Chevalier B; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 8(8):1053-1063. PubMed ID: 26205444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical outcomes at 2 years of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the Xience drug-eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease-AIDA trial substudy.
    Tijssen RYG; van der Schaaf RJ; Kraak RP; Vink MA; Hofma SH; Arkenbout EK; Weevers APJD; Kerkmeijer LSM; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Beijk MAM; Koch KT; Baan J; Vis MM; Piek JJ; Tijssen JGP; Henriques JPS; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 95(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 30968559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging.
    Tenekecioglu E; Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Costa R; Chamié D; Sotomi Y; Yu TB; Abizaid A; Liew HB; Santoso T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(11):1115-1130. PubMed ID: 28527768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Multicenter Italian Experience.
    Moscarella E; Ielasi A; Granata F; Coscarelli S; Stabile E; Latib A; Cortese B; Tespili M; Tanaka A; Capozzolo C; Caliendo L; Colombo A; Varricchio A
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(4):e003148. PubMed ID: 27059683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Long-term outcome of first 300 implanted Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in an all-comers Middle East population.
    Al Nooryani A; Elabbassi WN; AlBaba B; Kerfes JA; Abudaqa LM; Bhatia A; Abdelrahman NA; Boskovic N; Beleslin B
    J Int Med Res; 2019 Jan; 47(1):173-187. PubMed ID: 30235969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stent in small vessel disease: A propensity matched analysis of COMPARE II, RAI, and MAASSTAD-ABSORB studies.
    Tarantini G; Masiero G; Barioli A; Paradies V; Vlachojannis G; Tellaroli P; Cortese B; di Palma G; Varricchio A; Ielasi A; Loi B; Steffenino G; Ueshima D; Mojoli M; Smits P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):E115-E124. PubMed ID: 29513403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Experience With the Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Arteries Below the Knee: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes.
    Varcoe RL; Schouten O; Thomas SD; Lennox AF
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(16):1721-8. PubMed ID: 27539693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: results from GABI-R.
    Mehilli J; Achenbach S; Woehrle J; Baquet M; Riemer T; Muenzel T; Nef H; Naber C; Richardt G; Zahn R; Gori T; Neumann T; Kastner J; Schmermund A; Hamm C
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Dec; 13(11):1319-1326. PubMed ID: 28649953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: what have we learned from randomized-controlled clinical trials?
    Rizik DG; Hermiller JB; Simonton CA; Klassen KJ; Kereiakes DJ
    Coron Artery Dis; 2017 Jan; 28(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 27561169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mid- to long-term outcome of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Data of the BVS registry Göttingen predominantly from ACS patients.
    Hellenkamp K; Becker A; Gabriel YD; Hasenfuß G; Hünlich M; Jacobshagen C; Schillinger W; Schroeter MR
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 May; 234():58-63. PubMed ID: 28258843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Dangas GD; Serruys PW; Kereiakes DJ; Hermiller J; Rizvi A; Newman W; Sudhir K; Smith RS; Cao S; Theodoropoulos K; Cutlip DE; Lansky AJ; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 6(9):914-22. PubMed ID: 24050859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Neointimal coverage and late apposition of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted in the acute phase of myocardial infarction: OCT data from the PRAGUE-19 study.
    Toušek P; Kočka V; Malý M; Lisa L; Buděšínský T; Widimský P
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Jun; 31(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 25896128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Risk and timing of clinical events according to diabetic status of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from a propensity score matched comparison of ABSORB EXTEND and SPIRIT trials.
    Campos CM; Caixeta A; Franken M; Bartorelli AL; Whitbourn RJ; Wu CJ; Li Paul Kao H; Rosli MA; Carrie D; De Bruyne B; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Abizaid A;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 28471086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.