These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27476356)

  • 1. Congenital and acquired mandibular asymmetry: Mapping growth and remodeling in 3 dimensions.
    Solem RC; Ruellas A; Ricks-Oddie JL; Kelly K; Oberoi S; Lee J; Miller A; Cevidanes L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):238-51. PubMed ID: 27476356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional characterization of mandibular asymmetry in craniofacial microsomia.
    Chen YF; Baan F; Bruggink R; Bronkhorst E; Liao YF; Ongkosuwito E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Dec; 24(12):4363-4372. PubMed ID: 32382927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the pattern of mandibular asymmetry in mild craniofacial microsomia comparable to non-syndromic class II asymmetry?
    Chen YF; Vinayahalingam S; Bergé S; Liao YF; Maal T; Xi T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4603-4613. PubMed ID: 35218426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Condylar Hypoplasia and Facial Asymmetry in Craniofacial Microsomia Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Chen YF; Vinayahalingam S; Bergé S; Liao YF; Maal T; Xi T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 79(8):1750.e1-1750.e10. PubMed ID: 33939960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the adult three-dimensional craniofacial features of patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia with and without early mandible distraction.
    Ko EW; Chen PK; Lo LJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 46(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 28359687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional longitudinal changes in craniofacial growth in untreated hemifacial microsomia patients with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shibazaki-Yorozuya R; Yamada A; Nagata S; Ueda K; Miller AJ; Maki K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):579-94. PubMed ID: 24785922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Mandibular Asymmetry in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Paknahad M; Shahidi S; Bahrampour E; Beladi AS; Khojastepour L
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Aug; 55(7):919-924. PubMed ID: 27441699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Celikoglu M; Halicioglu K; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE; Ucar FI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 24182585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial features affecting mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class II patients.
    Thiesen G; Gribel BF; Freitas MPM; Oliver DR; Kim KB
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):437-445. PubMed ID: 28667433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlations Between Mandible Condylar Structures and External Ear Deformities in Hemifacial Microsomia With Three-Dimensional Analysis.
    Zhang Z; Li X; Chen X; Sun M; Kim BS; Aung ZM; Chai G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 33(4):1154-1158. PubMed ID: 34743153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lee H; Bayome M; Kim SH; Kim KB; Behrents RG; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 22858326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Part 2: Is the maxillary canting and its surgical correction in patients with CFM correlated to the mandibular deformity?
    Pluijmers BI; van de Lande LS; Caron CJJM; Wolvius EB; Dunaway DJ; Padwa BL; Koudstaal MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1436-1440. PubMed ID: 29909944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical guide assistant mandibular distraction osteogenesis and sagittal split osteotomy in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia.
    Shi L; Liu W; Yin L; Feng S; Xu S; Zhang ZY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):498-500. PubMed ID: 25699536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional-Printed Temporal Mandibular Joint for Use in Mandibular Distraction for Patients With Craniofacial Microsomia.
    Bradford PS; Black JS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(8):2273-2275. PubMed ID: 33136869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical Correction of Craniofacial Microsomia: Evaluation of Interventions in 565 Patients at Three Major Craniofacial Units.
    Pluijmers BI; Caron CJJM; van de Lande LS; Schaal S; Mathijssen IM; Wolvius EB; Bulstrode N; Evans RD; Padwa BL; Koudstaal MJ; Dunaway DJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1467-1476. PubMed ID: 31033829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Lower Facial Asymmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Non-Cleft Patients with Class III Skeletal Relationship.
    Lin Y; Chen G; Fu Z; Ma L; Li W
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0130235. PubMed ID: 26237311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Yavuz I; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24968641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional evaluation of craniofacial characteristics related to mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class I patients.
    Thiesen G; Freitas MPM; Araújo EA; Gribel BF; Kim KB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 29957327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetries in Caucasian adult patients with different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. A cone beam study using 3D segmentation and mirroring procedures.
    España-Pamplona P; Zamora-Martinez N; Tarazona-Álvarez B; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Paredes-Gallardo V
    Head Face Med; 2023 Dec; 19(1):54. PubMed ID: 38098053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Lemes CR; Tozzi CF; Gribel S; Gribel BF; Venezian GC; do Carmo Menezes C; Custodio W
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Feb; 43(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 32965519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.