These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27476357)
1. Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry. Shin SM; Kim YM; Kim NR; Choi YS; Park SB; Kim YI Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 27476357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary Study to Determine the Reference Plane of Patients With a Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Kim NR; Park SB; Shin SM; Choi YS; Kim SS; Son WS; Kim YI Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Nov; 54(6):707-714. PubMed ID: 27537492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of different midsagittal plane configurations for evaluating craniofacial asymmetry by expert preference. An S; Lee JY; Chung CJ; Kim KH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Dec; 152(6):788-797. PubMed ID: 29173858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography. Dobai A; Markella Z; Vízkelety T; Fouquet C; Rosta A; Barabás J J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Nov; 79(6):371-379. PubMed ID: 30255320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry. Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of two midsagittal planes in three-dimensional analysis and their measurement in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation: a comparative study. Zheng X; Wang L; Zhang B; Bai X; Qin K; Tian Y; Zhao R; Liu S; Wang J; Zhao Z Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):600-606. PubMed ID: 29980353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of midsagittal plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry using three-dimensional computed tomography. Kim TY; Baik JS; Park JY; Chae HS; Huh KH; Choi SC Imaging Sci Dent; 2011 Jun; 41(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 21977479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deviation of landmarks in accordance with methods of establishing reference planes in three-dimensional facial CT evaluation. Yoon KW; Yoon SJ; Kang BC; Kim YH; Kook MS; Lee JS; Palomo JM Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Sep; 44(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 25279341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two methods for quantitative assessment of mandibular asymmetry using cone beam computed tomography image volumes. AlHadidi A; Cevidanes LH; Mol A; Ludlow J; Styner M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):351-7. PubMed ID: 21831974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative validity and reproducibility study of various landmark-oriented reference planes in 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis for patients receiving orthognathic surgery. Lin HH; Chuang YF; Weng JL; Lo LJ PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117604. PubMed ID: 25668209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy and reliability of different midsagittal planes in the symmetry assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Yu S; Zheng Y; Dong L; Huang W; Wu H; Zhang Q; Yan X; Wu W; Lv T; Yuan X Clin Anat; 2024 Mar; 37(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 38186377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using the anterior cranial base to provide a reliable reference plane for patients with or without facial asymmetry. Feng B; Yu X; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Wu F; Yu M; Chen Q Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e230-e245. PubMed ID: 36055884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Landmark-Independent Method to Determine Midsagittal Plane and Its Clinical Application in Craniomaxillofacial Trauma. Lian X; Guo J; Zeng W; Qing H; Ju R; Tang W J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1511.e1-1511.e9. PubMed ID: 29549022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography. Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Correlation between hard tissue and soft tissue landmarks. Economou S; Stoustrup P; Kristensen KD; Dalstra M; Küseler A; Herlin T; Pedersen TK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):662-672.e1. PubMed ID: 29706214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel method of constructing a stable reference frame for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis. Zhang D; Wang S; Li J; Zhou Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 30173843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography. Cevidanes LH; Alhadidi A; Paniagua B; Styner M; Ludlow J; Mol A; Turvey T; Proffit WR; Rossouw PE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jun; 111(6):757-70. PubMed ID: 21497527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midsagittal Plane First: Building a Strong Facial Reference Frame for Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation. Grissom MK; Gateno J; English JD; Jacob HB; Kuang T; Gonzalez CE; Yuan P; Deng HH; Frick CJ; Kim D; Hassan A; Xia JJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 80(4):641-650. PubMed ID: 34942153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Deep learning-assisted construction of three-demensional facial midsagittal plane]. Zhu YJ; Xu Q; Zhao YJ; Zhang L; Fu ZW; Wen AN; Gao ZX; Zhang J; Fu XL; Wang Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Feb; 54(1):134-139. PubMed ID: 35165480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]