These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27476535)

  • 21. Inherent Tracers for Carbon Capture and Storage in Sedimentary Formations: Composition and Applications.
    Flude S; Johnson G; Gilfillan SM; Haszeldine RS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Aug; 50(15):7939-55. PubMed ID: 27379462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outlook of carbon capture technology and challenges.
    Wilberforce T; Baroutaji A; Soudan B; Al-Alami AH; Olabi AG
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 657():56-72. PubMed ID: 30530219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Carbon dioxide capture and geological storage.
    Holloway S
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2007 Apr; 365(1853):1095-107. PubMed ID: 17272239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis and status of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture technologies.
    Bhown AS; Freeman BC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):8624-32. PubMed ID: 21905745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Carbon Capture in the Cement Industry: Technologies, Progress, and Retrofitting.
    Hills T; Leeson D; Florin N; Fennell P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jan; 50(1):368-77. PubMed ID: 26630247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Generation, capture, and utilization of industrial carbon dioxide.
    Hunt AJ; Sin EH; Marriott R; Clark JH
    ChemSusChem; 2010 Mar; 3(3):306-22. PubMed ID: 20049768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies.
    Fleishman LA; De Bruin WB; Morgan MG
    Risk Anal; 2010 Sep; 30(9):1399-410. PubMed ID: 20561264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing the energy penalty costs of postcombustion CCS systems with amine-storage.
    Patiño-Echeverri D; Hoppock DC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):1243-52. PubMed ID: 22214538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer simulation of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and process economics of the fluid milk process.
    Tomasula PM; Yee WC; McAloon AJ; Nutter DW; Bonnaillie LM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3350-68. PubMed ID: 23522681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
    Williams RH; Liu G; Kreutz TG; Larson ED
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Molecular-Level Overhaul of γ-Aminopropyl Aminosilicone/Triethylene Glycol Post-Combustion CO
    Cantu DC; Malhotra D; Nguyen MT; Koech PK; Zhang D; Glezakou VA; Rousseau R; Page J; Zheng R; Perry RJ; Heldebrant DJ
    ChemSusChem; 2020 Jul; 13(13):3429-3438. PubMed ID: 32369677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Carbon Capture and Storage: concluding remarks.
    Maitland GC
    Faraday Discuss; 2016 Oct; 192():581-599. PubMed ID: 27722704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two-in-one fuel combining sugar cane with low rank coal and its CO₂ reduction effects in pulverized-coal power plants.
    Lee DW; Bae JS; Lee YJ; Park SJ; Hong JC; Lee BH; Jeon CH; Choi YC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(3):1704-10. PubMed ID: 23286316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Techno-economic investigation of a chemical looping combustion based power plant.
    Porrazzo R; White G; Ocone R
    Faraday Discuss; 2016 Oct; 192():437-457. PubMed ID: 27538703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Barriers and Prospects of Carbon Sequestration in India.
    Gupta A; Nema AK
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2014 Apr; 56(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 26563072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Techno-economic assessment of polymer membrane systems for postcombustion carbon capture at coal-fired power plants.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):3006-14. PubMed ID: 23406504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early atmospheric detection of carbon dioxide from carbon capture and storage sites.
    Pak NM; Rempillo O; Norman AL; Layzell DB
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):739-47. PubMed ID: 27111469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Potential impacts of electric power production utilizing natural gas, renewables and carbon capture and sequestration on US Freshwater resources.
    Tidwell VC; Malczynski LA; Kobos PH; Klise GT; Shuster E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Aug; 47(15):8940-7. PubMed ID: 23789965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.