These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27477397)

  • 1. The Effect of Low Frame Rate Fluoroscopy on the X-ray Dose during Coronary Intervention.
    Sadamatsu K; Nakano Y
    Intern Med; 2016; 55(15):1943-6. PubMed ID: 27477397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A propensity score matched valuation on feasibility of low frame rate fluoroscopy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with STEMI.
    Fan L; Luo Y; Chen Z; Cai W; Dong X; Lin C; Chen L
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 30386956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial.
    Jolly SS; Cairns J; Niemela K; Steg PG; Natarajan MK; Cheema AN; Rao SV; Cantor WJ; Džavík V; Budaj A; Sheth T; Valentin V; Fung A; Widimsky P; Ferrari E; Gao P; Jedrzejowski B; Mehta SR;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23517837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of Low-Dose Compared With Standard-Dose Radiation for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention (KAR RAD Study).
    Kar S; Teleb M; Albaghdadi A; Ibrahim A; Mukherjee D
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 31(6):187-194. PubMed ID: 30865914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes.
    Hansen JW; Foy A; Schmidt T; Ghahramani M; Chambers CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 27121130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Agarwal S; Parashar A; Ellis SG; Heupler FA; Lau E; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 25097198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of a Low Frame-Rate Protocol and Noise-Reduction Technology to Minimize Radiation Dose in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Maccagni D; Candilio L; Latib A; Godino C; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Colombo A; Azzalini L
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 May; 30(5):169-175. PubMed ID: 29715165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.
    Iwachow P; Miechowicz I; Kałmucki P; Dziki B; Szyszka A; Baszko A; Siminiak T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28364175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.
    Nakamura S; Kobayashi T; Funatsu A; Okada T; Mauti M; Waizumi Y; Yamada S
    Heart Vessels; 2016 May; 31(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 25840815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using 7.5 frames per second reduces radiation exposure in lower extremity peripheral vascular interventions.
    Akkus NI; Mina GS; Abdulbaki A; Shafiei F; Tandon N
    Vascular; 2015 Jun; 23(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 25208902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing radiation exposure during invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions implementing a simple four-step protocol.
    Seiffert M; Ojeda F; Müllerleile K; Zengin E; Sinning C; Waldeyer C; Lubos E; Schäfer U; Sydow K; Blankenberg S; Westermann D
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2015 Jun; 104(6):500-6. PubMed ID: 25608615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient radiation exposure in right versus left trans-radial approach for coronary procedures.
    Rigattieri S; Di Russo C; Cera M; Fedele S; Sciahbasi A; Pugliese FR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015; 16(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 25576274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of a Low Dose Protocol to Reduce Patient Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Maccagni D; Godino C; Latib A; Azzalini L; Pazzanese V; Chieffo A; Margonato A; Colombo A
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 119(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 27863695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in Patient Exposure to Radiation in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Over a 10-Year Period.
    Faroux L; Blanpain T; Nazeyrollas P; Tassan-Mangina S; Herce B; Tourneux C; Metz D
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 120(6):927-930. PubMed ID: 28739037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PATIENT RADIATION DOSES IN DIGITAL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND INTERVENTIONS.
    Al-Jabri AJ; Alzimami K; Alsafi K; Alaamer AS; Al-Rajhi MA; Suliman II
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 30260437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid metal/scaffold-jacket versus full-metal jackets in left anterior descending coronary artery diffuse disease: Differences in radiation exposure and fluoroscopic/procedural times.
    Rigatelli G; Zuin M; Frigato J; Dell'Avvocata F; Ronco F; Mazza A; Oliva L; Adami D; Bedendo E; Stefano P
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017 Dec; 18(8):592-595. PubMed ID: 28546035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AN ASSESSMENT OF RADIATION EXPOSURE DOSES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION BASED ON ANGIOGRAPHIC RECORDS.
    Maghbool M; Hosseini MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):474-481. PubMed ID: 30289545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.