118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27478834)
1. A Five-Gene Expression Signature Predicts Clinical Outcome of Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma.
Liu LW; Zhang Q; Guo W; Qian K; Wang Q
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():6945304. PubMed ID: 27478834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A five-DNA methylation signature act as a novel prognostic biomarker in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma.
Guo W; Zhu L; Yu M; Zhu R; Chen Q; Wang Q
Clin Epigenetics; 2018 Nov; 10(1):142. PubMed ID: 30446011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Annexin A2 and S100A10 are independent predictors of serous ovarian cancer outcome.
Lokman NA; Pyragius CE; Ruszkiewicz A; Oehler MK; Ricciardelli C
Transl Res; 2016 May; 171():83-95.e1-2. PubMed ID: 26925708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of Notch 3 gene expression in ovarian serous carcinoma.
Jung SG; Kwon YD; Song JA; Back MJ; Lee SY; Lee C; Hwang YY; An HJ
Cancer Sci; 2010 Sep; 101(9):1977-83. PubMed ID: 20624166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Role of Zinc Finger Homeobox 4 in Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma.
Ha M; Kim J; Park SM; Hong CM; Han ME; Song P; Kang CD; Lee D; Kim YH; Hur J; Oh SO
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2020 Mar; 24(3):145-149. PubMed ID: 32105524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. High expression of NQO1 is associated with poor prognosis in serous ovarian carcinoma.
Cui X; Li L; Yan G; Meng K; Lin Z; Nan Y; Jin G; Li C
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():244. PubMed ID: 25885439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of differentially expressed genes using an annealing control primer system in stage III serous ovarian carcinoma.
Kim YS; Hwan JD; Bae S; Bae DH; Shick WA
BMC Cancer; 2010 Oct; 10():576. PubMed ID: 20969748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of chemo-response in serous ovarian cancer.
Gonzalez Bosquet J; Newtson AM; Chung RK; Thiel KW; Ginader T; Goodheart MJ; Leslie KK; Smith BJ
Mol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 15(1):66. PubMed ID: 27756408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase serves as a marker of poor prognosis in gene expression profiles of serous ovarian cancer cells.
Okamoto A; Nikaido T; Ochiai K; Takakura S; Saito M; Aoki Y; Ishii N; Yanaihara N; Yamada K; Takikawa O; Kawaguchi R; Isonishi S; Tanaka T; Urashima M
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Aug; 11(16):6030-9. PubMed ID: 16115948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased Expression of LYNX1 in Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma Predicts Poor Prognosis.
Liu H; Wang A; Ma Y
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():1392674. PubMed ID: 33299855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact on high-grade serous ovarian cancer of obesity and lipid metabolism-related gene expression patterns: the underestimated driving force affecting prognosis.
Cuello MA; Kato S; Liberona F
J Cell Mol Med; 2018 Mar; 22(3):1805-1815. PubMed ID: 29266765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase expression in BRCA-proficient ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma; association with patient survival.
Gan A; Green AR; Nolan CC; Martin S; Deen S
Hum Pathol; 2013 Aug; 44(8):1638-47. PubMed ID: 23574784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of microRNA expression in serous ovarian carcinoma.
Li Y; Yao L; Liu F; Hong J; Chen L; Zhang B; Zhang W
Int J Mol Med; 2014 Aug; 34(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 24939816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expression of Interactive Genes Associated with Apoptosis and Their Prognostic Value for Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma.
Shin K; Kim KH; Yoon MS; Suh DS; Lee JY; Kim A; Eo W
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(3):513-21. PubMed ID: 27629740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcriptome-based signature predicts the effect of taxol in serous ovarian cancer.
Hou S; Dai J
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192812. PubMed ID: 29494610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HUR mRNA expression in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma effusions is associated with poor survival.
Davidson B; Holth A; Hellesylt E; Hadar R; Katz B; Tropé CG; Reich R
Hum Pathol; 2016 Feb; 48():95-101. PubMed ID: 26640230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. p53 autoantibodies as potential detection and prognostic biomarkers in serous ovarian cancer.
Anderson KS; Wong J; Vitonis A; Crum CP; Sluss PM; Labaer J; Cramer D
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Mar; 19(3):859-68. PubMed ID: 20200435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seven Genes Based Novel Signature Predicts Clinical Outcome and Platinum Sensitivity of High Grade IIIc Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.
Liu G; Chen L; Ren H; Liu F; Dong C; Wu A; Liu Z; Zheng Y; Cheng X; Liu L
Int J Biol Sci; 2018; 14(14):2012-2022. PubMed ID: 30585265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic profiling of alternative splicing signature reveals prognostic predictor for ovarian cancer.
Zhu J; Chen Z; Yong L
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Feb; 148(2):368-374. PubMed ID: 29191436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential gene expression profiles between tumor biopsies and short-term primary cultures of ovarian serous carcinomas: identification of novel molecular biomarkers for early diagnosis and therapy.
Bignotti E; Tassi RA; Calza S; Ravaggi A; Romani C; Rossi E; Falchetti M; Odicino FE; Pecorelli S; Santin AD
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 16725184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
