These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27480485)
1. A critical review of frameworks used for evaluating reliability and relevance of (eco)toxicity data: Perspectives for an integrated eco-human decision-making framework. Roth N; Ciffroy P Environ Int; 2016 Oct; 95():16-29. PubMed ID: 27480485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. White paper on the promotion of an integrated risk assessment concept in European regulatory frameworks for chemicals. Wilks MF; Roth N; Aicher L; Faust M; Papadaki P; Marchis A; Calliera M; Ginebreda A; Andres S; Kühne R; Schüürmann G; Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jul; 521-522():211-8. PubMed ID: 25841074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing and refining the Science in Risk Assessment and Policy (SciRAP) web-based platform for evaluating the reliability and relevance of in vivo toxicity studies. Beronius A; Molander L; Zilliacus J; Rudén C; Hanberg A J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 38(12):1460-1470. PubMed ID: 29806706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative evaluation of five hazard screening tools. Panko JM; Hitchcock K; Fung M; Spencer PJ; Kingsbury T; Mason AM Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):139-154. PubMed ID: 26777143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the reliability of ecotoxicological studies: An overview of current needs and approaches. Moermond C; Beasley A; Breton R; Junghans M; Laskowski R; Solomon K; Zahner H Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):640-651. PubMed ID: 27869364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternatives Assessment Frameworks: Research Needs for the Informed Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals. Jacobs MM; Malloy TF; Tickner JA; Edwards S Environ Health Perspect; 2016 Mar; 124(3):265-80. PubMed ID: 26339778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making. Rudén C; Adams J; Ågerstrand M; Brock TC; Poulsen V; Schlekat CE; Wheeler JR; Henry TR Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):652-663. PubMed ID: 27599457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH. Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the credibility of histopathology data in environmental endocrine toxicity studies. Wolf JC; Maack G Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Mar; 36(3):601-611. PubMed ID: 27883231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New approach to weight-of-evidence assessment of ecotoxicological effects in regulatory decision-making. Hall AT; Belanger SE; Guiney PD; Galay-Burgos M; Maack G; Stubblefield W; Martin O Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):573-579. PubMed ID: 28383801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Approaches for describing and communicating overall uncertainty in toxicity characterizations: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as a case study. Beck NB; Becker RA; Erraguntla N; Farland WH; Grant RL; Gray G; Kirman C; LaKind JS; Jeffrey Lewis R; Nance P; Pottenger LH; Santos SL; Shirley S; Simon T; Dourson ML Environ Int; 2016; 89-90():110-28. PubMed ID: 26827183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An introduction to Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Exposure Datasets (CREED) for use in environmental assessments. Merrington G; Nowell LH; Peck C Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Jul; 20(4):975-980. PubMed ID: 38329199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives for integrating human and environmental risk assessment and synergies with socio-economic analysis. Péry AR; Schüürmann G; Ciffroy P; Faust M; Backhaus T; Aicher L; Mombelli E; Tebby C; Cronin MT; Tissot S; Andres S; Brignon JM; Frewer L; Georgiou S; Mattas K; Vergnaud JC; Peijnenburg W; Capri E; Marchis A; Wilks MF Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jul; 456-457():307-16. PubMed ID: 23624004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A quantitative weight of evidence methodology for the assessment of reproductive and developmental toxicity and its application for classification and labeling of chemicals. Dekant W; Bridges J Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():173-185. PubMed ID: 27620966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations. Arnold SM; Greggs B; Goyak KO; Landenberger BD; Mason AM; Howard B; Zaleski RT Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 28294522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic comparison of study quality criteria. Lynch HN; Goodman JE; Tabony JA; Rhomberg LR Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():187-98. PubMed ID: 26743741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspectives for integrating human and environmental exposure assessments. Ciffroy P; Péry ARR; Roth N Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 568():512-521. PubMed ID: 26672386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relevance and reliability of experimental data in human health risk assessment of pesticides. Kaltenhäuser J; Kneuer C; Marx-Stoelting P; Niemann L; Schubert J; Stein B; Solecki R Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():227-237. PubMed ID: 28655655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CRED: Criteria for reporting and evaluating ecotoxicity data. Moermond CT; Kase R; Korkaric M; Ågerstrand M Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 May; 35(5):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26399705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]