These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27481137)
1. CompoundProtein Interaction Prediction Within Chemogenomics: Theoretical Concepts, Practical Usage, and Future Directions. Brown JB; Niijima S; Okuno Y Mol Inform; 2013 Dec; 32(11-12):906-21. PubMed ID: 27481137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of chemical-protein interactions: multitarget-QSAR versus computational chemogenomic methods. Cheng F; Zhou Y; Li J; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y Mol Biosyst; 2012 Sep; 8(9):2373-84. PubMed ID: 22751809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Future of Computational Chemogenomics. Jacoby E; Brown JB Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1825():425-450. PubMed ID: 30334216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality Issues with Public Domain Chemogenomics Data. Kalliokoski T; Kramer C; Vulpetti A Mol Inform; 2013 Dec; 32(11-12):898-905. PubMed ID: 27481136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational approaches in chemogenomics and chemical biology: current and future impact on drug discovery. Bajorath J Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2008 Dec; 3(12):1371-6. PubMed ID: 23506102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferring Chemogenomic Features from Drug-Target Interaction Networks. Yamanishi Y Mol Inform; 2013 Dec; 32(11-12):991-9. PubMed ID: 27481144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structure-Based Approaches to Target Fishing and Ligand Profiling. Rognan D Mol Inform; 2010 Mar; 29(3):176-87. PubMed ID: 27462761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-target view to feature selection: identification of molecular interaction features in ligand-target space. Niijima S; Yabuuchi H; Okuno Y J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 21142044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chemogenomics in drug discovery: computational methods based on the comparison of binding sites. Vulpetti A; Kalliokoski T; Milletti F Future Med Chem; 2012 Oct; 4(15):1971-9. PubMed ID: 23088277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Probabilistic prediction and ranking of human protein-protein interactions. Scott MS; Barton GJ BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():239. PubMed ID: 17615067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States. Paciorek CJ; Liu Y; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Network inference from AP-MS data: computational challenges and solutions. Teng B; Zhao C; Liu X; He Z Brief Bioinform; 2015 Jul; 16(4):658-74. PubMed ID: 25378435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PyDPI: freely available python package for chemoinformatics, bioinformatics, and chemogenomics studies. Cao DS; Liang YZ; Yan J; Tan GS; Xu QS; Liu S J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3086-96. PubMed ID: 24047419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinase-kernel models: accurate in silico screening of 4 million compounds across the entire human kinome. Martin E; Mukherjee P J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):156-70. PubMed ID: 22133092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007). Hafner J J Phys Condens Matter; 2008 Feb; 20(6):060301. PubMed ID: 21693862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]