BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27481328)

  • 1. A rethink of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Wu AM; Tong TJ; Wang XY
    J Evid Based Med; 2016 Nov; 9(4):166-169. PubMed ID: 27481328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective versus multi-segmental decompression and fusion for multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis with single-segment degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Sun W; Xue C; Tang XY; Feng H; Yuan F; Guo KJ; Zhao J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30755227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decompression alone vs. decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Thomas K; Faris P; McIntosh G; Manners S; Abraham E; Bailey CS; Paquet J; Cadotte D; Jacobs WB; Rampersaud YR; Manson NA; Hall H; Fisher CG
    Spine J; 2019 Oct; 19(10):1633-1639. PubMed ID: 31195133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chang W; Yuwen P; Zhu Y; Wei N; Feng C; Zhang Y; Chen W
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 May; 137(5):637-650. PubMed ID: 28361467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Försth P; Ólafsson G; Carlsson T; Frost A; Borgström F; Fritzell P; Öhagen P; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1413-23. PubMed ID: 27074066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Brox JI; Solberg TK; Storheim K; Rekeland F; Hermansen E; Indrekvam K; Hellum C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):404-413. PubMed ID: 27421276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decompression Surgery Alone Versus Decompression Plus Fusion in Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Swiss Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study With 3 Years of Follow-up.
    Ulrich NH; Burgstaller JM; Pichierri G; Wertli MM; Farshad M; Porchet F; Steurer J; Held U;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Sep; 42(18):E1077-E1086. PubMed ID: 28092340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Benzel EC; Amin-Hanjani S; Barker FG; Harrington JF; Magge SN; Strugar J; Coumans JV; Borges LF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Oct; 1(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 15478364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decompression and coflex interlaminar stabilisation compared with conventional surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li AM; Li X; Yang Z
    Int J Surg; 2017 Apr; 40():60-67. PubMed ID: 28254421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decompression versus decompression plus fusion for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Huang P; Liu Z; Liu H; Yu Y; Huang L; Lu M; Jin X
    Pain Pract; 2023 Apr; 23(4):390-398. PubMed ID: 36504445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
    Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fusion or Not for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Shen J; Xu S; Xu S; Ye S; Hao J
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29357326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial.
    Davis RJ; Errico TJ; Bae H; Auerbach JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(18):1529-39. PubMed ID: 23680830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
    Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lumbar decompression and lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang LH; Liu W; Li J; Zhu WY; An LK; Yuan S; Ke H; Zang L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(27):e20323. PubMed ID: 32629626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Case-control study on therapeutic effects between unilateral decompression via fenestration under Quadrant retractor and open decompression technique with fusion and internal fixation for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Wen TL; Liu XM; Du P; Zhang TY; Wang F; Li F
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Aug; 27(8):658-62. PubMed ID: 25464591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.