BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27481397)

  • 1. Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.
    Choi JY; Aquadro CF
    J Mol Evol; 2016 Aug; 83(1-2):50-60. PubMed ID: 27481397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.
    Akashi H
    Genetics; 1995 Feb; 139(2):1067-76. PubMed ID: 7713409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.
    Bartolomé C; Maside X; Yi S; Grant AL; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2005 Mar; 169(3):1495-507. PubMed ID: 15545653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation in the Intensity of Selection on Codon Bias over Time Causes Contrasting Patterns of Base Composition Evolution in Drosophila.
    Jackson BC; Campos JL; Haddrill PR; Charlesworth B; Zeng K
    Genome Biol Evol; 2017 Jan; 9(1):102-123. PubMed ID: 28082609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Zeng K; Charlesworth B
    J Mol Evol; 2010 Jan; 70(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 20041239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in the recombinational environment affect divergence in the yellow gene of Drosophila.
    Munte A; Aguade M; Segarra C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Jun; 18(6):1045-56. PubMed ID: 11371593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.
    Akashi H; Kliman RM; Eyre-Walker A
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):49-60. PubMed ID: 9720271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The coevolutionary period of Wolbachia pipientis infecting Drosophila ananassae and its impact on the evolution of the host germline stem cell regulating genes.
    Choi JY; Aquadro CF
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Sep; 31(9):2457-71. PubMed ID: 24974378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.
    Comeron JM; Guthrie TB
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2519-30. PubMed ID: 16120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection on codon usage in Drosophila americana.
    Maside X; Lee AW; Charlesworth B
    Curr Biol; 2004 Jan; 14(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 14738738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strong regional heterogeneity in base composition evolution on the Drosophila X chromosome.
    Ko WY; Piao S; Akashi H
    Genetics; 2006 Sep; 174(1):349-62. PubMed ID: 16547109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila.
    Vicario S; Moriyama EN; Powell JR
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 7():226. PubMed ID: 18005411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular evolution of synonymous codon usage in Populus.
    Ingvarsson PK
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 8():307. PubMed ID: 18983655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative genomics of Drosophila mtDNA: Novel features of conservation and change across functional domains and lineages.
    Montooth KL; Abt DN; Hofmann JW; Rand DM
    J Mol Evol; 2009 Jul; 69(1):94-114. PubMed ID: 19533212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.
    Rand DM; Kann LM
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):393-407. PubMed ID: 9720291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Campos JL; Zeng K; Parker DJ; Charlesworth B; Haddrill PR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):811-23. PubMed ID: 23204387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations.
    Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila.
    McVean GA; Vieira J
    Genetics; 2001 Jan; 157(1):245-57. PubMed ID: 11139506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns of mutation and selection at synonymous sites in Drosophila.
    Singh ND; Bauer DuMont VL; Hubisz MJ; Nielsen R; Aquadro CF
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Dec; 24(12):2687-97. PubMed ID: 18000010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pervasive Strong Selection at the Level of Codon Usage Bias in
    Machado HE; Lawrie DS; Petrov DA
    Genetics; 2020 Feb; 214(2):511-528. PubMed ID: 31871131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.