These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27484214)

  • 1. Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Kumar A; Zhang KY
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):685-693. PubMed ID: 27484214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.
    Prathipati P; Nagao C; Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):817-828. PubMed ID: 27714493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal strategies for virtual screening of induced-fit and flexible target in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge.
    Ye Z; Baumgartner MP; Wingert BM; Camacho CJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):695-706. PubMed ID: 27573981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.
    Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 30084081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.
    Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Aug; 31(8):689-699. PubMed ID: 28668990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular docking performance evaluated on the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 drug-like ligand datasets.
    Selwa E; Martiny VY; Iorga BI
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):829-839. PubMed ID: 27699554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.
    Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 31463704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.
    Gathiaka S; Liu S; Chiu M; Yang H; Stuckey JA; Kang YN; Delproposto J; Kubish G; Dunbar JB; Carlson HA; Burley SK; Walters WP; Amaro RE; Feher VA; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):651-668. PubMed ID: 27696240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015.
    Slynko I; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):669-683. PubMed ID: 27480696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A pose prediction approach based on ligand 3D shape similarity.
    Kumar A; Zhang KY
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Jun; 30(6):457-69. PubMed ID: 27379501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.
    Grudinin S; Kadukova M; Eisenbarth A; Marillet S; Cazals F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):791-804. PubMed ID: 27718029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blinded predictions of binding modes and energies of HSP90-α ligands for the 2015 D3R grand challenge.
    Mey ASJS; Juárez-Jiménez J; Hennessy A; Michel J
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2016 Oct; 24(20):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 27485604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016.
    Fradera X; Verras A; Hu Y; Wang D; Wang H; Fells JI; Armacost KA; Crespo A; Sherborne B; Wang H; Peng Z; Gao YD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):113-127. PubMed ID: 28913710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaction with specific HSP90 residues as a scoring function: validation in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Santos-Martins D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):731-742. PubMed ID: 27549813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting binding poses and affinity ranking in D3R Grand Challenge using PL-PatchSurfer2.0.
    Shin WH; Kihara D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1083-1094. PubMed ID: 31506789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.
    Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lessons learned in induced fit docking and metadynamics in the Drug Design Data Resource Grand Challenge 2.
    Baumgartner MP; Evans DA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 29127581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A D3R prospective evaluation of machine learning for protein-ligand scoring.
    Sunseri J; Ragoza M; Collins J; Koes DR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):761-771. PubMed ID: 27592011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.