123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27484594)
1. Assessment of Dental Arch Changes and Buccal Bone Thickness in Patients treated with Self-ligating Brackets.
Ibiapina DJ; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro RL; Almeida MR; Mendonça DL; Conti AC
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):434-9. PubMed ID: 27484594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
Almeida MR; Futagami C; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cone Beam Computed Tomography-based Evaluation of the Anterior Teeth Position Changes obtained by Passive Self-ligating Brackets.
Rhoden FK; Maltagliati LÁ; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Filho LC; de Almeida Cardoso M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):623-9. PubMed ID: 27659077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets using cone beam computed tomography.
Leite V; Conti AC; Navarro R; Almeida M; Oltramari-Navarro P; Almeida R
Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov; 82(6):1078-82. PubMed ID: 22409394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
Cattaneo PM; Treccani M; Carlsson K; Thorgeirsson T; Myrda A; Cevidanes LH; Melsen B
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances : A randomized clinical trial.
Alabdullah MM; Burhan AS; Nabawia A; Nawaya F; Saltaji H
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr; 84(Suppl 2):74-83. PubMed ID: 35788397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.
Bashir R; Sonar S; Batra P; Srivastava A; Singla A
Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):687-692. PubMed ID: 31466930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transversal changes in dental arches from non-extraction treatment with self ligating brackets.
Maltagliati LA; Myiahira YI; Fattori L; Filho LC; Cardoso M
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):39-45. PubMed ID: 24094010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Self-ligating vs. conventional brackets in the treatment of patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion: a clinical trial of dental and cephalometric analysis].
Chen YP; Li S
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 22800664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Evaluation of Mandibular Dental and Basal Arch Dimensions in Class I and Class II Division 1 Adult Syrian Patients using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Al-Hilal LH; Sultan K; Hajeer MY; Mahmoud G; Wanli AA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):431-437. PubMed ID: 29728549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Root resorption due to orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional brackets : A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Aras I; Unal I; Huniler G; Aras A
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 May; 79(3):181-190. PubMed ID: 29651519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geometric morphometric evaluations of a randomized prospective split-mouth study on modes of ligation and reverse-curve mechanics.
Celar AG; Onodera K; Bertl MH; Astl E; Bantleon HP; Sato S; Mitteroecker P
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Aug; 17(3):158-69. PubMed ID: 24720396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system.
Vajaria R; BeGole E; Kusnoto B; Galang MT; Obrez A
Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 21446870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances.
Tecco S; Tetè S; Perillo L; Chimenti C; Festa F
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 20072744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of long-term stability of maxillary dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a transpalatal arch followed by fixed appliances.
Raucci G; Elyasi M; Pachêco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():24. PubMed ID: 26215180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of WALA ridge and dental arch dimensions changes after orthodontic treatment using a passive self-ligating system or conventional fixed appliance.
Esteves T; Salvatore Freitas KM; Vaz de Lima D; Cotrin P; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; De Freitas MR; Gobbi de Oliveira RC
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31397413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: A cone beam computed tomographic study.
Morais JF; Melsen B; de Freitas KMS; Castello Branco N; Garib DG; Cattaneo PM
Angle Orthod; 2018 Nov; 88(6):748-756. PubMed ID: 29911904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
