169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27484645)
1. Aposematism: balancing salience and camouflage.
Barnett JB; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
Biol Lett; 2016 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 27484645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.
Merilaita S; Ruxton GD
J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolutionary transitions from camouflage to aposematism: Hidden signals play a pivotal role.
Loeffler-Henry K; Kang C; Sherratt TN
Science; 2023 Mar; 379(6637):1136-1140. PubMed ID: 36927015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distance-dependent pattern blending can camouflage salient aposematic signals.
Barnett JB; Cuthill IC; Scott-Samuel NE
Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jul; 284(1858):. PubMed ID: 28679722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.
Skelhorn J; Rowe C
Biol Lett; 2006 Sep; 2(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 17148400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distance-dependent aposematism and camouflage in the cinnabar moth caterpillar (
Barnett JB; Cuthill IC; Scott-Samuel NE
R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Feb; 5(2):171396. PubMed ID: 29515858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coevolution of group-living and aposematism in caterpillars: warning colouration may facilitate the evolution from group-living to solitary habits.
Wang L; Cornell SJ; Speed MP; Arbuckle K
BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):25. PubMed ID: 33583398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.
Skelhorn J; Rowe C
Curr Biol; 2007 Sep; 17(17):1479-83. PubMed ID: 17716896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.
Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey.
Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(16):9181-4. PubMed ID: 11459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.
Endler JA; Mappes J
Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aposematism: what should our starting point be?
Speed MP; Ruxton GD
Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Feb; 272(1561):431-8. PubMed ID: 15734698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.
Servedio MR
Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 10937250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why has transparency evolved in aposematic butterflies? Insights from the largest radiation of aposematic butterflies, the Ithomiini.
McClure M; Clerc C; Desbois C; Meichanetzoglou A; Cau M; Bastin-Héline L; Bacigalupo J; Houssin C; Pinna C; Nay B; Llaurens V; Berthier S; Andraud C; Gomez D; Elias M
Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Apr; 286(1901):20182769. PubMed ID: 30991931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey.
Gamberale G; Tullberg BS
Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Warning Coloration, Body Size, and the Evolution of Gregarious Behavior in Butterfly Larvae.
McLellan CF; Cuthill IC; Montgomery SH
Am Nat; 2023 Jul; 202(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 37384762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Birds learn to avoid aposematic prey by using the appearance of host plants.
McLellan CF; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
Curr Biol; 2021 Dec; 31(23):5364-5369.e4. PubMed ID: 34624210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The coevolution of warning signals.
Sherratt TN
Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Apr; 269(1492):741-6. PubMed ID: 11934367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
