These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27484816)

  • 1. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia.
    Bae SY; Park JY; Jeong ID; Kim HY; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 27484816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings.
    Moldovan O; Luthardt RG; Corcodel N; Rudolph H
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1273-8. PubMed ID: 21983002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
    Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of various gypsum materials on precision of fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia copings.
    Kim JH; Kim KB; Kim WC; Rhee HS; Lee IH; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25748454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
    Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between five CAD/CAM systems for fit of zirconia copings.
    Habib SR; Al Otaibi AK; Al Anazi TA; Al Anazi SM
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(6):437-444. PubMed ID: 29756132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.
    Re D; Cerutti F; Augusti G; Cerutti A; Augusti D
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 25126621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertical marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated with one direct and three indirect digital scanning techniques.
    Akhlaghian M; Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Pardis S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32868029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers.
    Beuer F; Neumeier P; Naumann M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 18976261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of preparation angle on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia crown copings.
    Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Richter J; Edelhoff D; Gernet W
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Mar; 40(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 19417888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility.
    Schaefer O; Watts DC; Sigusch BW; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    Dent Mater; 2012 Mar; 28(3):320-6. PubMed ID: 22265824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of marginal fit of cemented zirconia copings manufactured after digital impression with lava™ C.O.S and conventional impression technique.
    Dauti R; Cvikl B; Franz A; Schwarze UY; Lilaj B; Rybaczek T; Moritz A
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):129. PubMed ID: 27931256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional fit of lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Kuepper H; Sigusch BW; Thompson GA; Hefti AF; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 23228498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trueness and marginal fit of implant-supported complete-arch fixed prosthesis frameworks made of high-performance polymers and titanium: An explorative in-vitro study.
    Abou-Ayash S; Schimmel M; Özcan M; Ozcelik B; Brägger U; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103784. PubMed ID: 34419479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.