These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27485196)

  • 1. Applicability Domain Dependent Predictive Uncertainty in QSAR Regressions.
    Sahlin U; Jeliazkova N; Öberg T
    Mol Inform; 2014 Jan; 33(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 27485196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Kernel-Based Method for Assessing Uncertainty on Individual QSAR Predictions.
    Tebby C; Mombelli E
    Mol Inform; 2012 Oct; 31(10):741-51. PubMed ID: 27476456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Risk Assessment Perspective of Current Practice in Characterizing Uncertainties in QSAR Regression Predictions.
    Sahlin U; Filipsson M; Öberg T
    Mol Inform; 2011 Jun; 30(6-7):551-64. PubMed ID: 27467156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. General Approach to Estimate Error Bars for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Predictions of Molecular Activity.
    Liu R; Glover KP; Feasel MG; Wallqvist A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1561-1575. PubMed ID: 29949366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DPRESS: Localizing estimates of predictive uncertainty.
    Clark RD
    J Cheminform; 2009 Jul; 1(1):11. PubMed ID: 20298517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds.
    Shen M; Béguin C; Golbraikh A; Stables JP; Kohn H; Tropsha A
    J Med Chem; 2004 Apr; 47(9):2356-64. PubMed ID: 15084134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.
    Tetko IV; Sushko I; Pandey AK; Zhu H; Tropsha A; Papa E; Oberg T; Todeschini R; Fourches D; Varnek A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1733-46. PubMed ID: 18729318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty in QSAR predictions.
    Sahlin U
    Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 23614548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the reliability of a QSAR model's predictions.
    He L; Jurs PC
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Jun; 23(6):503-23. PubMed ID: 15896992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining a novel k-nearest neighbours approach to assess the applicability domain of a QSAR model for reliable predictions.
    Sahigara F; Ballabio D; Todeschini R; Consonni V
    J Cheminform; 2013 May; 5(1):27. PubMed ID: 23721648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Relative Importance of Domain Applicability Metrics for Estimating Prediction Errors in QSAR Varies with Training Set Diversity.
    Sheridan RP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1098-107. PubMed ID: 25998559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel QSAR model of Salmonella mutagenicity and its application in the safety assessment of drug impurities.
    Valencia A; Prous J; Mora O; Sadrieh N; Valerio LG
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 273(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 24090816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of machine learning reliability methods for quantifying the applicability domain of QSAR regression models.
    Toplak M; Močnik R; Polajnar M; Bosnić Z; Carlsson L; Hasselgren C; Demšar J; Boyer S; Zupan B; Stålring J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Feb; 54(2):431-41. PubMed ID: 24490838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using beta binomials to estimate classification uncertainty for ensemble models.
    Clark RD; Liang W; Lee AC; Lawless MS; Fraczkiewicz R; Waldman M
    J Cheminform; 2014; 6():34. PubMed ID: 24987464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of nonlinearities and uncorrelated or correlated errors in realistic simulated data on the prediction abilities of augmented classical least squares and partial least squares.
    Melgaard DK; Haaland DM
    Appl Spectrosc; 2004 Sep; 58(9):1065-73. PubMed ID: 15479523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust cross-validation of linear regression QSAR models.
    Konovalov DA; Llewellyn LE; Vander Heyden Y; Coomans D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):2081-94. PubMed ID: 18826208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Multiple Linear Regressions and Neural Networks based QSAR models for the design of new antitubercular compounds.
    Ventura C; Latino DA; Martins F
    Eur J Med Chem; 2013; 70():831-45. PubMed ID: 24246731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A similarity-based QSAR model for predicting acute toxicity towards the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas).
    Cassotti M; Ballabio D; Todeschini R; Consonni V
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(3):217-43. PubMed ID: 25780951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local classification: Locally weighted-partial least squares-discriminant analysis (LW-PLS-DA).
    Bevilacqua M; Marini F
    Anal Chim Acta; 2014 Aug; 838():20-30. PubMed ID: 25064239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal and external validation of the long-term QSARs for neutral organics to fish from ECOSAR™.
    de Haas EM; Eikelboom T; Bouwman T
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2011; 22(5-6):545-59. PubMed ID: 21732893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.