These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27485196)

  • 21. Does rational selection of training and test sets improve the outcome of QSAR modeling?
    Martin TM; Harten P; Young DM; Muratov EN; Golbraikh A; Zhu H; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2570-8. PubMed ID: 23030316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Profile-QSAR: a novel meta-QSAR method that combines activities across the kinase family to accurately predict affinity, selectivity, and cellular activity.
    Martin E; Mukherjee P; Sullivan D; Jansen J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1942-56. PubMed ID: 21667971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Classification of biodegradable materials using QSAR modelling with uncertainty estimation.
    Rocha WFC; Sheen DA
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 Oct; 27(10):799-811. PubMed ID: 27710037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Iterative fragment selection: a group contribution approach to predicting fish biotransformation half-lives.
    Brown TN; Arnot JA; Wania F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Aug; 46(15):8253-60. PubMed ID: 22779755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis.
    Zhu H; Tropsha A; Fourches D; Varnek A; Papa E; Gramatica P; Oberg T; Dao P; Cherkasov A; Tetko IV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):766-84. PubMed ID: 18311912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Critically Assessing the Predictive Power of QSAR Models for Human Liver Microsomal Stability.
    Liu R; Schyman P; Wallqvist A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1566-75. PubMed ID: 26170251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recursive Random Forests Enable Better Predictive Performance and Model Interpretation than Variable Selection by LASSO.
    Zhu XW; Xin YJ; Ge HL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Apr; 55(4):736-46. PubMed ID: 25746224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictive QSAR modeling of HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor TIBO derivatives.
    Mandal AS; Roy K
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Apr; 44(4):1509-24. PubMed ID: 18760864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How Precise Are Our Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Derived Predictions for New Query Chemicals?
    Roy K; Ambure P; Kar S
    ACS Omega; 2018 Sep; 3(9):11392-11406. PubMed ID: 31459245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimation of reliability of predictions and model applicability domain evaluation in the analysis of acute toxicity (LD50).
    Sazonovas A; Japertas P; Didziapetris R
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):127-48. PubMed ID: 20373217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimizing predictive performance of CASE Ultra expert system models using the applicability domains of individual toxicity alerts.
    Chakravarti SK; Saiakhov RD; Klopman G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2609-18. PubMed ID: 22947043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The importance of outlier detection and training set selection for reliable environmental QSAR predictions.
    Furusjö E; Svenson A; Rahmberg M; Andersson M
    Chemosphere; 2006 Mar; 63(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 16153688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting physical properties of emerging compounds with limited physical and chemical data: QSAR model uncertainty and applicability to military munitions.
    Bennett ER; Clausen J; Linkov E; Linkov I
    Chemosphere; 2009 Nov; 77(10):1412-8. PubMed ID: 19793608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. GTM-Based QSAR Models and Their Applicability Domains.
    Gaspar HA; Baskin II; Marcou G; Horvath D; Varnek A
    Mol Inform; 2015 Jun; 34(6-7):348-56. PubMed ID: 27490381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictivity of QSAR.
    Benigni R; Bossa C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):971-80. PubMed ID: 18426198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three useful dimensions for domain applicability in QSAR models using random forest.
    Sheridan RP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):814-23. PubMed ID: 22385389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mode of action-based local QSAR modeling for the prediction of acute toxicity in the fathead minnow.
    Yuan H; Wang YY; Cheng YY
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):327-35. PubMed ID: 17224289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Chemometrics-assisted simultaneous voltammetric determination of ascorbic acid, uric acid, dopamine and nitrite: application of non-bilinear voltammetric data for exploiting first-order advantage.
    Gholivand MB; Jalalvand AR; Goicoechea HC; Skov T
    Talanta; 2014 Feb; 119():553-63. PubMed ID: 24401455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. QSAR with quantum topological molecular similarity indices: toxicity of aromatic aldehydes to Tetrahymena pyriformis.
    Kar S; Harding AP; Roy K; Popelier PL
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):149-68. PubMed ID: 20373218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of validated QSAR models of D1 dopaminergic antagonists for database mining.
    Oloff S; Mailman RB; Tropsha A
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(23):7322-32. PubMed ID: 16279792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.