These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27485293)

  • 1. The Moses-Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models.
    Dinnes J; Mallett S; Hopewell S; Roderick PJ; Deeks JJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():77-87. PubMed ID: 27485293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
    Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of an oscillometric ankle-brachial index in the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Herráiz-Adillo Á; Cavero-Redondo I; Álvarez-Bueno C; Martínez-Vizcaíno V; Pozuelo-Carrascosa DP; Notario-Pacheco B
    Int J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 71(9):. PubMed ID: 28851093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data.
    Takwoingi Y; Guo B; Riley RD; Deeks JJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1896-1911. PubMed ID: 26116616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.
    van Enst WA; Scholten RJ; Whiting P; Zwinderman AH; Hooft L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1192-9. PubMed ID: 24996667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies.
    Naaktgeboren CA; Ochodo EA; Van Enst WA; de Groot JAH; Hooft L; Leeflang MMG; Bossuyt PM; Moons KGM; Reitsma JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26772804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
    Macaskill P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) and hierarchical SROC models for analysis of diagnostic test evaluations of antibody ELISAs for paratuberculosis.
    Toft N; Nielsen SS
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Nov; 92(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 19747743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis.
    Inaba Y; Chen JA; Bergmann SR
    Atherosclerosis; 2012 Jan; 220(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 21764060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Graphical enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
    Patel A; Cooper N; Freeman S; Sutton A
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 32706182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast masses: an SROC curve with fixed and random effects linear meta-regression models.
    Akçil M; Karaağaoğlu E; Demirhan B
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 May; 36(5):303-10. PubMed ID: 18418880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
    Marinovich ML; Houssami N; Macaskill P; Sardanelli F; Irwig L; Mamounas EP; von Minckwitz G; Brennan ME; Ciatto S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Mar; 105(5):321-33. PubMed ID: 23297042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of Rapid Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Khuroo MS; Khuroo NS; Khuroo MS
    J Clin Exp Hepatol; 2014 Sep; 4(3):226-40. PubMed ID: 25755565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
    Wang F; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of maternal serum ischemia-modified albumin for detection of preeclampsia.
    Seshadri Reddy V; Munikumar M; Duggina P; Varma N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Jul; 32(13):2173-2181. PubMed ID: 29325458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.