183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27485453)
1. Cost analysis of a randomized stem cell mobilization study in multiple myeloma.
Varmavuo V; Silvennoinen R; Anttila P; Säily M; Sankelo M; Putkonen M; Ahonen J; Mahlamäki E; Mäntymaa P; Savolainen ER; Remes K; Jantunen E
Ann Hematol; 2016 Oct; 95(10):1653-9. PubMed ID: 27485453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of chemo-free strategy with G-CSF plus plerixafor on demand versus intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF as PBSC mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: An Italian explorative cost Analysis.
Laszlo D; Marcacci GP; Martino M; Radice D; Rabascio C; Lucchetti B; Magarò A; Caime A; Menna S; Lionetti MT; Bertolini F
Transfus Apher Sci; 2020 Oct; 59(5):102819. PubMed ID: 32499108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stem Cell Mobilization Yields with Daratumumab- and Lenalidomide-Containing Quadruplet Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Findings from the MASTER and GRIFFIN Trials.
Chhabra S; Callander N; Watts NL; Costa LJ; Thapa B; Kaufman JL; Laubach J; Sborov DW; Reeves B; Rodriguez C; Chari A; Silbermann R; Anderson LD; Bal S; Dhakal B; Nathwani N; Shah N; Medvedova E; Bumma N; Holstein SA; Costello C; Jakubowiak A; Wildes TM; Schmidt T; Orlowski RZ; Shain KH; Cowan AJ; Dholaria B; Cornell RF; Jerkins JH; Pei H; Cortoos A; Patel S; Lin TS; Usmani SZ; Richardson PG; Voorhees PM
Transplant Cell Ther; 2023 Mar; 29(3):174.e1-174.e10. PubMed ID: 36494017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.
Antar A; Otrock ZK; Kharfan-Dabaja MA; Ghaddara HA; Kreidieh N; Mahfouz R; Bazarbachi A
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2015 Jun; 50(6):813-7. PubMed ID: 25751646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.
Nademanee AP; DiPersio JF; Maziarz RT; Stadtmauer EA; Micallef IN; Stiff PJ; Hsu FJ; Bridger G; Bolwell BJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Oct; 18(10):1564-72. PubMed ID: 22683613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rescue stem cell mobilization with plerixafor economizes leukapheresis in patients with multiple myeloma.
Hundemer M; Engelhardt M; Bruckner T; Kraeker S; Schmitt A; Sauer S; Neben K; Witzens-Harig M; Goldschmidt H; Ho AD; Wuchter P
J Clin Apher; 2014 Dec; 29(6):299-304. PubMed ID: 24771277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.
Chaudhary L; Awan F; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Tse W; Craig M; Hamadani M
J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):359-67. PubMed ID: 23765597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost and clinical analysis of autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with G-CSF and plerixafor compared to G-CSF and cyclophosphamide.
Shaughnessy P; Islas-Ohlmayer M; Murphy J; Hougham M; MacPherson J; Winkler K; Silva M; Steinberg M; Matous J; Selvey S; Maris M; McSweeney PA
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2011 May; 17(5):729-36. PubMed ID: 20813198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.
Awan F; Kochuparambil ST; Falconer DE; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Deremer D; Jillella A; Craig M; Hamadani M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Oct; 48(10):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23584435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.
Afifi S; Adel NG; Devlin S; Duck E; Vanak J; Landau H; Chung DJ; Lendvai N; Lesokhin A; Korde N; Reich L; Landgren O; Giralt S; Hassoun H
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2016 Apr; 51(4):546-52. PubMed ID: 26726942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Pilot, Exploratory, Randomized, Phase II Safety Study Evaluating Tumor Cell Mobilization and Apheresis Product Contamination in Patients Treated with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone or Plus Plerixafor.
Nahi H; Celanovic M; Liu Q; Lund J; Peceliunas V
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2019 Jan; 25(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 30149148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stem Cell Mobilization for Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Daratumumab-Based Induction Therapy: A Real- World Experience.
Thurlapati A; Roubal K; Davis JA; Shah SZ; Smith D; McGann M; Gaffney K; Cendagorta A; Maldonado A; Weeda E; Hashmi H
Transplant Cell Ther; 2023 May; 29(5):340.e1-340.e4. PubMed ID: 36804934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Tuchman SA; Bacon WA; Huang LW; Long G; Rizzieri D; Horwitz M; Chute JP; Sullivan K; Morris Engemann A; Yopp A; Li Z; Corbet K; Chao N; Gasparetto C
J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 25293363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Successful hematopoietic stem cell collection in patients who fail initial plerixafor mobilization for autologous stem cell transplant.
Veeraputhiran M; Jain T; Cronin S; Al-Kadhimi Z; Abidi MH; Ayash L; Mellert K; Lum LG; Ratanatharathorn V; Uberti JP; Deol A
J Clin Apher; 2014 Dec; 29(6):293-8. PubMed ID: 24700728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Plerixafor on-demand combined with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant improvement in peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and harvest with no increase in costs.
Milone G; Martino M; Spadaro A; Leotta S; Di Marco A; Scalzulli P; Cupri A; Di Martina V; Schinocca E; Spina E; Tripepi G
Br J Haematol; 2014 Jan; 164(1):113-23. PubMed ID: 24138497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.
Veltri L; Cumpston A; Shillingburg A; Wen S; Luo J; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Craig M; Hamadani M; Kanate AS
Cytotherapy; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1785-92. PubMed ID: 26475754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Plerixafor: A chemokine receptor-4 antagonist for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
Steinberg M; Silva M
Clin Ther; 2010 May; 32(5):821-43. PubMed ID: 20685493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmacoeconomic impact of up-front use of plerixafor for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Kim SS; Renteria AS; Steinberg A; Banoff K; Isola L
Cytotherapy; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1584-1589. PubMed ID: 24927717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blood graft cellular composition and posttransplant outcomes in myeloma patients mobilized with or without low-dose cyclophosphamide: a randomized comparison.
Valtola J; Silvennoinen R; Ropponen A; Siitonen T; Säily M; Sankelo M; Terävä V; Putkonen M; Kuittinen T; Pelkonen J; Mäntymaa P; Remes K; Varmavuo V; Jantunen E
Transfusion; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1394-401. PubMed ID: 27041692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
