242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27485604)
1. Blinded predictions of binding modes and energies of HSP90-α ligands for the 2015 D3R grand challenge.
Mey ASJS; Juárez-Jiménez J; Hennessy A; Michel J
Bioorg Med Chem; 2016 Oct; 24(20):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 27485604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.
Gathiaka S; Liu S; Chiu M; Yang H; Stuckey JA; Kang YN; Delproposto J; Kubish G; Dunbar JB; Carlson HA; Burley SK; Walters WP; Amaro RE; Feher VA; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):651-668. PubMed ID: 27696240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Kumar A; Zhang KY
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):685-693. PubMed ID: 27484214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.
Grudinin S; Kadukova M; Eisenbarth A; Marillet S; Cazals F
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):791-804. PubMed ID: 27718029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of domain knowledge on blinded predictions of binding energies by alchemical free energy calculations.
Mey ASJS; Jiménez JJ; Michel J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):199-210. PubMed ID: 29134431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.
Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Aug; 31(8):689-699. PubMed ID: 28668990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the affinity of Farnesoid X Receptor ligands through a hierarchical ranking protocol: a D3R Grand Challenge 2 case study.
Réau M; Langenfeld F; Zagury JF; Montes M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):231-238. PubMed ID: 28913743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.
Prathipati P; Nagao C; Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):817-828. PubMed ID: 27714493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molecular docking performance evaluated on the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 drug-like ligand datasets.
Selwa E; Martiny VY; Iorga BI
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):829-839. PubMed ID: 27699554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interaction with specific HSP90 residues as a scoring function: validation in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Santos-Martins D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):731-742. PubMed ID: 27549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.
Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 30084081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of molecular docking and free energy calculations protocols using the D3R Grand Challenge 4 dataset.
Elisée E; Gapsys V; Mele N; Chaput L; Selwa E; de Groot BL; Iorga BI
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 31677003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal strategies for virtual screening of induced-fit and flexible target in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge.
Ye Z; Baumgartner MP; Wingert BM; Camacho CJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):695-706. PubMed ID: 27573981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Docking-undocking combination applied to the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Ruiz-Carmona S; Barril X
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):805-815. PubMed ID: 27709317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015.
Slynko I; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):669-683. PubMed ID: 27480696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blinded evaluation of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) ligands binding using molecular docking and free energy calculations.
Selwa E; Elisée E; Zavala A; Iorga BI
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):273-286. PubMed ID: 28865056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
