These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27485711)

  • 1. [Algorithm for Choosing the Study Design in Systematic Reviews].
    Peinemann F; Kleijnen J
    Klin Padiatr; 2016 Sep; 228(5):235-239. PubMed ID: 27485711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of an algorithm to provide awareness in choosing study designs for inclusion in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a method study.
    Peinemann F; Kleijnen J
    BMJ Open; 2015 Aug; 5(8):e007540. PubMed ID: 26289450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study designs and systematic reviews of interventions: building evidence across study designs.
    Sargeant JM; Kelton DF; O'Connor AM
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():10-7. PubMed ID: 24905992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity.
    Seo HJ; Kim SY; Lee YJ; Jang BH; Park JE; Sheen SS; Hahn SK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():200-5. PubMed ID: 26408805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based postoperative pain management in nursing: is a randomized-controlled trial the most appropriate design?
    Seers K; Crichton N; Carroll D; Richards S; Saunders T
    J Nurs Manag; 2004 May; 12(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 15089956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using multiple types of studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions--a systematic review.
    Peinemann F; Tushabe DA; Kleijnen J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e85035. PubMed ID: 24416098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care.
    El Dib RP; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):689-92. PubMed ID: 17683315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.
    Hopewell S; Wolfenden L; Clarke M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 18411039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews and their application to research in speech and language therapy: a response to T. R. Pring's 'Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials' (2004).
    Garrett Z; Thomas J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2006; 41(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 16272005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The science of systematic reviewing studies of diagnostic tests.
    Oosterhuis WP; Niessen RW; Bossuyt PM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2000 Jul; 38(7):577-88. PubMed ID: 11028761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?
    Ogilvie D; Egan M; Hamilton V; Petticrew M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Oct; 59(10):886-92. PubMed ID: 16166365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The practice of systematic reviews. I. Introduction].
    Offringa M; de Craen AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):653-6. PubMed ID: 10321295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.