These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27485711)

  • 41. Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study: part I: why and for whom?
    Silva V; Grande AJ; Martimbianco AL; Riera R; Carvalho AP
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2012; 130(6):398-404. PubMed ID: 23338737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Case reports, case series and systematic reviews.
    Martyn C
    QJM; 2002 Apr; 95(4):197-8. PubMed ID: 11937645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems.
    Dixon-Woods M; Fitzpatrick R; Roberts K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2001 May; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 11489038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Introduction to neonatal systematic reviews.
    Sinclair JC; Bracken MB; Horbar JD; Soll RF
    Pediatrics; 1997 Nov; 100(5):892-5. PubMed ID: 9346993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Selection criteria for systematic literature reviews.
    Bliss M
    J Tissue Viability; 2001 Oct; 11(4):173-4; author reply 174-5. PubMed ID: 11949611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews.
    Pollock A; Farmer SE; Brady MC; Langhorne P; Mead GE; Mehrholz J; van Wijck F; Wiffen PJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():106-10. PubMed ID: 26341023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews.
    Mathes T; Pieper D
    Syst Rev; 2019 Sep; 8(1):226. PubMed ID: 31481098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting.
    Li T; Mayo-Wilson E; Fusco N; Hong H; Dickersin K
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):497. PubMed ID: 30223876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods.
    Anderson LM; Oliver SR; Michie S; Rehfuess E; Noyes J; Shemilt I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1223-9. PubMed ID: 23953087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions.
    Guise JM; Chang C; Butler M; Viswanathan M; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():6-10. PubMed ID: 28720511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Use of Systematic Reviews When Designing and Reporting Surgical Trials.
    Rosenthal R; Bucher HC; Dwan K
    Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):e35-e36. PubMed ID: 28266978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Importance of contacting authors for data on adverse events when compiling systematic reviews.
    Berstock J; Beswick A
    BMJ; 2014 Feb; 348():g1394. PubMed ID: 24500366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Systematic reviews and making decisions.
    Logan S
    Child Care Health Dev; 1998 Jul; 24(4):255-7. PubMed ID: 9693853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Essential elements of evidenced-based endodontics: steps involved in conducting clinical research.
    Torabinejad M; Bahjri K
    J Endod; 2005 Aug; 31(8):563-9. PubMed ID: 16044037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews.
    Shannon S
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2002 Oct; 53(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 12391923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions.
    Hoffmann TC; Oxman AD; Ioannidis JP; Moher D; Lasserson TJ; Tovey DI; Stein K; Sutcliffe K; Ravaud P; Altman DG; Perera R; Glasziou P
    BMJ; 2017 Jul; 358():j2998. PubMed ID: 28729459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Balancing benefits and harms in health care: observational data on harm are already included in systematic reviews.
    Jefferson T; Demicheli V
    BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7417):750. PubMed ID: 14512492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Multiple systematic reviews: methods for assessing discordances of results.
    Moja L; Fernandez del Rio MP; Banzi R; Cusi C; D'Amico R; Liberati A; Lodi G; Lucenteforte E; Minozzi S; Pecoraro V; Virgili G; Parmelli E
    Intern Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 7(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 22941412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Misclassification of study designs in the dermatology literature.
    Ohn J; Eun SJ; Kim DY; Park HS; Cho S; Yoon HS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 79(2):315-319. PubMed ID: 29128460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Evidence based medicine. Generalizations on the application to nuclear medicine. Part I].
    Alvarez Ruiz S; Cortés Hernández J; Rodeño Ortiz De Zárate E; Alonso Colmenares JI; Alcorta Armentia P
    Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2001 Jun; 20(4):313-28; quiz 329-31. PubMed ID: 11940422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.