These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27485978)

  • 1. The Calculation of Molecular Structural Similarity: Principles and Practice.
    Willett P
    Mol Inform; 2014 Jun; 33(6-7):403-13. PubMed ID: 27485978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do 2D fingerprints detect structurally diverse active compounds? Revealing compound subset-specific fingerprint features through systematic selection.
    Heikamp K; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2254-65. PubMed ID: 21793563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advances in 2D fingerprint similarity searching.
    Geppert H; Bajorath J
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2010 Jun; 5(6):529-42. PubMed ID: 22823165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction and recombination of fingerprints of different design increase compound recall and the structural diversity of hits.
    Nisius B; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Feb; 75(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 20028390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constructing plasma protein binding model based on a combination of cluster analysis and 4D-fingerprint molecular similarity analyses.
    Liu J; Yang L; Li Y; Pan D; Hopfinger AJ
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Feb; 14(3):611-21. PubMed ID: 16214346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a compound class-directed similarity coefficient that accounts for molecular complexity effects in fingerprint searching.
    Wang Y; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 19480406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (part 1): fingerprint construction and modeling performance for similarity searching, bioactivity classification and scaffold hopping.
    Škuta C; Cortés-Ciriano I; Dehaen W; Kříž P; van Westen GJP; Tetko IV; Bender A; Svozil D
    J Cheminform; 2020 May; 12(1):39. PubMed ID: 33431038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarity searching using 2D structural fingerprints.
    Willett P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 672():133-58. PubMed ID: 20838967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and evaluation of a novel class-directed 2D fingerprint to search for structurally diverse active compounds.
    Eckert H; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2515-26. PubMed ID: 17125192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scaffold hopping using clique detection applied to reduced graphs.
    Barker EJ; Buttar D; Cosgrove DA; Gardiner EJ; Kitts P; Willett P; Gillet VJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 16562978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel Scaffold FingerPrint (SFP): applications in scaffold hopping and scaffold-based selection of diverse compounds.
    Rabal O; Amr FI; Oyarzabal J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 25558803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-Classified Multilevel Modelling of the Effectiveness of Similarity-Based Virtual Screening.
    Mazalan L; Bell A; Sbaffi L; Willett P
    ChemMedChem; 2018 Mar; 13(6):582-587. PubMed ID: 29106074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apparent asymmetry in fingerprint similarity searching is a direct consequence of differences in bit densities and molecular size.
    Wang Y; Eckert H; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2007 Jul; 2(7):1037-42. PubMed ID: 17506042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the effects of related fingerprints on molecular similarity using an eigenvalue entropy approach.
    Kuwahara H; Gao X
    J Cheminform; 2021 Mar; 13(1):27. PubMed ID: 33757582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Database fingerprint (DFP): an approach to represent molecular databases.
    Fernández-de Gortari E; García-Jacas CR; Martinez-Mayorga K; Medina-Franco JL
    J Cheminform; 2017; 9():9. PubMed ID: 28224019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and evaluation of a molecular fingerprint involving the transformation of property descriptor values into a binary classification scheme.
    Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(4):1151-7. PubMed ID: 12870906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unsupervised 3D ring template searching as an ideas generator for scaffold hopping: use of the LAMDA, RigFit, and field-based similarity search (FBSS) methods.
    Bohl M; Loeprecht B; Wendt B; Heritage T; Richmond NJ; Willett P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):1882-90. PubMed ID: 16995717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fuzzy tricentric pharmacophore fingerprints. 1. Topological fuzzy pharmacophore triplets and adapted molecular similarity scoring schemes.
    Bonachéra F; Parent B; Barbosa F; Froloff N; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2457-77. PubMed ID: 17125187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Random or rational design? Evaluation of diverse compound subsets from chemical structure databases.
    Pötter T; Matter H
    J Med Chem; 1998 Feb; 41(4):478-88. PubMed ID: 9484498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Activity-relevant similarity values for fingerprints and implications for similarity searching.
    Jasial S; Hu Y; Vogt M; Bajorath J
    F1000Res; 2016; 5():. PubMed ID: 27127620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.