These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

692 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27486031)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
    Poljak B; Agarwal U; Jackson R; Alfirevic Z; Sharp A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A; Khan N; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.
    Akolekar R; Panaitescu AM; Ciobanu A; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 54(4):484-491. PubMed ID: 31271475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
    Nicolaides KH; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Akolekar R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of delivery of small-for-gestational-age neonates and adverse perinatal outcome by fetoplacental Doppler at 37 weeks' gestation.
    Triunfo S; Crispi F; Gratacos E; Figueras F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):364-371. PubMed ID: 27241184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks.
    Ciobanu A; Anthoulakis C; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 30912210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
    Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.
    Ciobanu A; Formuso C; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 30779239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age.
    Price CR; Roeckner J; Odibo L; Odibo A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Oct; 35(20):3931-3936. PubMed ID: 33172312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Hadlock Method Is Superior to Newer Methods for the Prediction of the Birth Weight Percentile.
    Blue NR; Savabi M; Beddow ME; Katukuri VR; Fritts CM; Izquierdo LA; Chao CR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Mar; 38(3):587-596. PubMed ID: 30244476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The association between second trimester estimated fetal weight and small for gestational age at birth.
    Fox NS; Gettenberg G; Stern E; Schwartz JJ; Kim R; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(15):2398-402. PubMed ID: 26381844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive accuracy of Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) chorionicity-specific twin growth charts for stillbirth: a validation study.
    Kalafat E; Sebghati M; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 53(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 29660172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prenatal standard for fetal weight improves the prenatal diagnosis of small for gestational age fetuses in pregnancies at increased risk.
    Visentin S; Londero AP; Cataneo I; Bellussi F; Salsi G; Pilu G; Cosmi E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Mar; 22(1):254. PubMed ID: 35346088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prenatal prediction of adverse outcome using different charts and definitions of fetal growth restriction.
    Mascherpa M; Pegoire C; Meroni A; Minopoli M; Thilaganathan B; Frick A; Bhide A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 63(5):605-612. PubMed ID: 38145554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Definitions matter: detection rates and perinatal outcome for infants classified prenatally as having late fetal growth restriction using SMFM biometric vs ISUOG/Delphi consensus criteria.
    Schreiber V; Hurst C; da Silva Costa F; Stoke R; Turner J; Kumar S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 61(3):377-385. PubMed ID: 35866888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implication of third-trimester screening accuracy for small-for-gestational age and additive value of third-trimester growth-trajectory indicators in predicting severe adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk population: pragmatic secondary analysis of IRIS study.
    van Roekel M; Henrichs J; Franx A; Verhoeven CJ; de Jonge A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Aug; 62(2):209-218. PubMed ID: 36704993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 19-24 weeks.
    Lesmes C; Gallo DM; Panaiotova J; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 46(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 25704207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.