119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27486086)
1. In-line phase-contrast breast tomosynthesis: a phantom feasibility study at a synchrotron radiation facility.
Bliznakova K; Russo P; Kamarianakis Z; Mettivier G; Requardt H; Bravin A; Buliev I
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):6243-63. PubMed ID: 27486086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality evaluation of breast tomosynthesis with synchrotron radiation.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Rigon L; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5621-34. PubMed ID: 22957628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast tomosynthesis using the multiple projection algorithm adapted for stationary detectors.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Pallikarakis N
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 26890907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative power law analysis of structured breast phantom and patient images in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081920. PubMed ID: 23927334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a breast software model for 2D and 3D X-ray imaging studies of the breast.
Baneva Y; Bliznakova K; Cockmartin L; Marinov S; Buliev I; Mettivier G; Bosmans H; Russo P; Marshall N; Bliznakov Z
Phys Med; 2017 Sep; 41():78-86. PubMed ID: 28483356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
Polat A; Yildirim I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Synchrotron based planar imaging and digital tomosynthesis of breast and biopsy phantoms using a CMOS active pixel sensor.
Szafraniec MB; Konstantinidis AC; Tromba G; Dreossi D; Vecchio S; Rigon L; Sodini N; Naday S; Gunn S; McArthur A; Olivo A
Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 25498332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography.
Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Glick SJ; D'Orsi CJ; Baker SP; Webber RL
Acad Radiol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1085-97. PubMed ID: 11131053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Lell M; Böhner C; Bautz WA; Mertelmeier T
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1219-23. PubMed ID: 17136645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. X-ray phase-contrast tomosynthesis for improved breast tissue discrimination.
Schleede S; Bech M; Grandl S; Sztrókay A; Herzen J; Mayr D; Stockmar M; Potdevin G; Zanette I; Rack A; Weitkamp T; Pfeiffer F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 24387825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grating-based phase contrast tomosynthesis imaging: proof-of-concept experimental studies.
Li K; Ge Y; Garrett J; Bevins N; Zambelli J; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011903. PubMed ID: 24387511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality comparison between a phase-contrast synchrotron radiation breast CT and a clinical breast CT: a phantom based study.
Brombal L; Arfelli F; Delogu P; Donato S; Mettivier G; Michielsen K; Oliva P; Taibi A; Sechopoulos I; Longo R; Fedon C
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17778. PubMed ID: 31780707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
