215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27486184)
1. Patient perspectives on a personally controlled electronic health record used in regional Australia.
Hanna L; Gill SD; Newstead L; Hawkins M; Osborne RH
Health Inf Manag; 2017 Jan; 46(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 27486184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).
Andrews L; Gajanayake R; Sahama T
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Dec; 83(12):889-900. PubMed ID: 25200198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A qualitative study of Australians' opinions about personally controlled electronic health records.
Lehnbom EC; McLachlan A; Brien JA
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 178():105-10. PubMed ID: 22797027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes of pregnant women towards personally controlled electronic, hospital-held, and patient-held medical record systems: a survey study.
Quinlivan JA; Lyons S; Petersen RW
Telemed J E Health; 2014 Sep; 20(9):810-5. PubMed ID: 25046543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records.
Kerai P; Wood P; Martin M
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 24382474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current patient and healthcare worker attitudes to eHealth and the personally controlled electronic health record in major hospitals.
Armani R; Mitchell LE; Allen-Graham J; Heriot NR; Kotsimbos T; Wilson JW
Intern Med J; 2016 Jun; 46(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 27040359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Demographic characteristics of Australian health consumers who were early registrants for opt-in personally controlled electronic health records.
Torrens E; Walker SM
Health Inf Manag; 2017 Sep; 46(3):127-133. PubMed ID: 28537210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients Know Best: Qualitative Study on How Families Use Patient-Controlled Personal Health Records.
Schneider H; Hill S; Blandford A
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Feb; 18(2):e43. PubMed ID: 26912201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia.
Pearce C; Bainbridge M
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(4):707-13. PubMed ID: 24650635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Knowledge and attitudes regarding the personally controlled electronic health record: an Australian national survey.
Lehnbom EC; Brien JE; McLachlan AJ
Intern Med J; 2014 Apr; 44(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 24754689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records.
Spriggs M; Arnold MV; Pearce CM; Fry C
J Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 38(9):535-9. PubMed ID: 22573881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. eHealth-as-a-Service (eHaaS): a data-driven decision making approach in Australian context.
Black A; Sahama T; Gajanayake R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():915-9. PubMed ID: 25160321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient Access to Health Data: A Review of Philosophic and Healthcare Issues.
Xu A; Chapman BE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Jan; 310():1524-1525. PubMed ID: 38269727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The introduction of the national e-health record into Australian community pharmacy practice: pharmacists' perceptions.
Mooranian A; Emmerton L; Hattingh L
Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Dec; 21(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 23560554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive beliefs and privacy concerns shape the future for the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record.
Lehnbom EC; Douglas HE; Makeham MA
Intern Med J; 2016 Jan; 46(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 26813902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic Personal Health Record Use Among Nurses in the Nursing Informatics Community.
Gartrell K; Trinkoff AM; Storr CL; Wilson ML
Comput Inform Nurs; 2015 Jul; 33(7):306-14. PubMed ID: 26061563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) for Adults with Severe Communication Impairments: Findings of Pilot Research.
Hemsley B; Georgiou A; Balandin S; Carter R; Hill S; Higgins I; Van Vliet P; McCarthy S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 214():100-6. PubMed ID: 26210425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patients' adoption of the e-appointment scheduling service: A case study in primary healthcare.
Zhang X; Yu P; Yan J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 204():176-81. PubMed ID: 25087546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a Nationwide Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record by Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Case Study with the French DMP.
Seroussi B; Bouaud J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 235():333-337. PubMed ID: 28423809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Realist review to inform development of the electronic advance care plan for the personally controlled electronic health record in Australia.
Skinner I; Smith C; Jaffray L
Telemed J E Health; 2014 Nov; 20(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 25290057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
