BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27486727)

  • 1. Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Comparison of Two Different Treatment Algorithms.
    Napier ML; Armstrong DJ; McLoone SF; McLoone EM
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2016 Sep; 53(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 27486727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old.
    Eshraghi B; Khalilipour E; Ameli K; Bazvand F; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
    Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 28627958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Al-Faky YH; Mousa A; Kalantan H; Al-Otaibi A; Alodan H; Alsuhaibani AH
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 99(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 25185252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Endoscopically Assisted Primary Probing and Bicanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Aged 4 to 7 Years.
    Arici C; Mergen B; Ozan T; Batu Oto B
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2023; 60(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 35446188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Success Rates of Conventional Versus Endoscope-Assisted Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 12 Years and Younger.
    Galindo-Ferreiro A; Akaishi P; Cruz A; Khandekar R; Dossari S; Dufaileej M; Galvez-Ruiz A; Schellini S
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2016 Sep; 53(5):292-9. PubMed ID: 27383144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monocanalicular silastic intubation for the initial correction of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Engel JM; Hichie-Schmidt C; Khammar A; Ostfeld BM; Vyas A; Ticho BH
    J AAPOS; 2007 Apr; 11(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 17307001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors Predictive of Success in Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
    Beato J; Mota Á; Gonçalves N; Santos-Silva R; Magalhães A; Breda J; Falcão-Reis F
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2017 Mar; 54(2):123-127. PubMed ID: 27977034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initial nasolacrimal duct probing in children under age 5: cure rate and factors affecting success.
    Kashkouli MB; Kassaee A; Tabatabaee Z
    J AAPOS; 2002 Dec; 6(6):360-3. PubMed ID: 12506276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Congenital nasolacrymal duct obstruction: pulled monocanalicular intubation (Monoka) versus pushed monocanalicular intubation (Masterka)].
    Vernat-Tabarly O; Delmas J; Robert PY
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2020 Jun; 43(6):461-466. PubMed ID: 32360081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transcanalicular endoscopic primary dacryoplasty for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Matsumura N; Suzuki T; Goto S; Fujita T; Yamane S; Maruyama-Inoue M; Kadonosono K
    Eye (Lond); 2019 Jun; 33(6):1008-1013. PubMed ID: 30783256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Factors affected therapeutic results in treatment of children congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction by Ritleng lacrimal intubation].
    Yu G; Hu M; Wu Q; Cao WH; Fan YW; Lin Q; Liu W
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 48(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 22932332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Cha DS; Lee H; Park MS; Lee JM; Baek SH
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 21052504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular intubations in incomplete complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Eshraghi B; Jamshidian-Tehrani M; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
    Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):215-217. PubMed ID: 28627964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High incidence and recurrence of tympanostomy tube procedures in children who underwent nasolacrimal duct probe and intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Vicinanzo MG; Cooper KM; Gerber AL; Long J; McGwin G
    J AAPOS; 2023 Oct; 27(5):286.e1-286.e4. PubMed ID: 37734706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of treatment modalities and prognostic factors in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Al-Faky YH; Al-Sobaie N; Mousa A; Al-Odan H; Al-Huthail R; Osman E; Al-Mosallam AR
    J AAPOS; 2012 Feb; 16(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 22370666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nasolacrimal duct intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.
    Okumuş S; Öner V; Durucu C; Coşkun E; Aksoy Ü; Durucu E; Şahin L; Erbağcı I
    Eye (Lond); 2016 Jan; 30(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 26449195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Success rates of dacryoendoscopy-guided probing for recalcitrant congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Fujimoto M; Ogino K; Matsuyama H; Miyazaki C
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 60(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 27116947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of balloon catheter dilatation and silicon intubation as the secondary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed primary probing].
    Hu M; Wu Q; Fan YW; Cao WW; Lin Q; Yu G
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 52(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 26906708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; one procedure for all versus all procedures for one.
    Kashkouli MB; Karimi N; Khademi B
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 30(5):364-371. PubMed ID: 31219833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nasolacrimal duct office probing in children under the age of 12 months: Cure rate and cost evaluation.
    Le Garrec J; Abadie-Koebele C; Parienti JJ; Molgat Y; Degoumois A; Mouriaux F
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Feb; 39(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 26826746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.