These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27487090)

  • 1. Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey.
    Toews I; Glenton C; Lewin S; Berg RC; Noyes J; Booth A; Marusic A; Malicki M; Munthe-Kaas HM; Meerpohl JJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0159290. PubMed ID: 27487090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
    Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
    J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results.
    Malički M; Marušić A;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1103-10. PubMed ID: 25034197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: an international survey.
    Broome M; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG
    Nurs Ethics; 2010 Nov; 17(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 21097972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS' VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE.
    Oehrlein EM; Graff JS; Perfetto EM; Mullins CD; Dubois RW; Anyanwu C; Onukwugha E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 29415784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
    Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication practices and standards: recommendations from GSK Vaccines' author survey.
    Camby I; Delpire V; Rouxhet L; Morel T; Vanderlinden C; Van Driessche N; Poplazarova T
    Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():446. PubMed ID: 25406766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 7: understanding the potential impacts of dissemination bias.
    Booth A; Lewin S; Glenton C; Munthe-Kaas H; Toews I; Noyes J; Rashidian A; Berg RC; Nyakang'o B; Meerpohl JJ;
    Implement Sci; 2018 Jan; 13(Suppl 1):12. PubMed ID: 29384076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.
    Resnik DB; Elmore SA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):169-88. PubMed ID: 25633924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes towards animal study registries and their characteristics: An online survey of three cohorts of animal researchers.
    Wieschowski S; Laser H; Sena ES; Bleich A; Tolba R; Strech D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226443. PubMed ID: 31905203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advertising in dermatology journals: journals' and journal editors' policies, practices, and attitudes.
    Bartus CL; Katz KA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 55(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 16781302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing.
    Lipworth WL; Kerridge IH; Carter SM; Little M
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Apr; 72(7):1056-63. PubMed ID: 21388730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses.
    Toews I; Booth A; Berg RC; Lewin S; Glenton C; Munthe-Kaas HM; Noyes J; Schroter S; Meerpohl JJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():133-139. PubMed ID: 28433676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors.
    Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Molenaar N; Bossuyt PM; Scholten RJ
    Neth J Med; 2014 Sep; 72(7):349-55. PubMed ID: 25178768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.