These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 274877)

  • 1. The limitation of screening effect. A review of cervical disorders in previously screened women.
    Gad C; Koch F
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(6):719-22. PubMed ID: 274877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Difficulties in the detection and the diagnosis of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix in the presence of associated dysplasia].
    Dargent D; Bremond A; Rudigoz RG; Beau GE
    Nouv Presse Med; 1976 Nov; 5(40):2691-3. PubMed ID: 1005084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effectiveness of cervical cytology screening for cervical cancer (author's transl)].
    Soost HJ; Bockmühl B; Zock H
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Sep; 104(38):1331-5. PubMed ID: 477559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smear biopsies: a cause of negative follow-up biopsies in patients with premalignant conditions of the uterine cervix.
    Berner A; Høeg K; Oppedal BR
    Diagn Gynecol Obstet; 1980; 2(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 7439010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
    Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appraisal of self-collected cervical specimens in cytologic screening of uterine cancer.
    Arata T; Sekiba K; Kato K
    Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 277040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnosis of cervical dysplasias].
    Pérez Dettoma J; Santamaría M; Jurado M; Cabezón C; Domínquez J; de la Fuente F; López García G
    Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1980 Dec; 24(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 7336009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The validation of cervical cytology. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
    Soost HJ; Lange HJ; Lehmacher W; Ruffing-Kullmann B
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 1994641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of a hospital based cytology screening program.
    Das DK; Murthy NS; Bhatnager P; Juneja A; Sharma S; Pant JN; Bhatt NC; Sharma KC; Luthra UK
    Neoplasma; 1992; 39(6):381-4. PubMed ID: 1491729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost effectiveness of population screening and rescreening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 6792845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.
    Wagner D; Noltenius HW
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 6576540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience with diagnosis and management of pre and early cancers of the cervix.
    Saraiya U; Garud M; Mehtaji S; Fernandes W
    Int Surg; 1978 Feb; 63(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 632017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
    Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A comparison of cytological and histological studies on women with a colposcopically atypical cervix uteri].
    Zamfirova K; Zlatkov V; Makaveeva V
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(5):27-30. PubMed ID: 2091471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cytology in Greenland and occurrence of cervical carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and dysplasia. Extent and impact of uncoordinated screening activity 1976-1985.
    Højgaard Nielsen N; Jensen H; Hansen PK
    Arctic Med Res; 1988 Oct; 47(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 3214508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of cytologic screening on the detection of cervical carcinoma.
    Yajima A; Mori T; Sato S; Wakisaka T; Suzuki M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):565-8. PubMed ID: 7070726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
    Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as determined by cytology and colposcopic biopsy.
    Bamford PN; Beilby JO; Steele SJ; Vlies R
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(5):482-4. PubMed ID: 6578644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.