These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27487843)

  • 1. An overview of methods for network meta-analysis using individual participant data: when do benefits arise?
    Debray TP; Schuit E; Efthimiou O; Reitsma JB; Ioannidis JP; Salanti G; Moons KG;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1351-1364. PubMed ID: 27487843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study.
    Gao Y; Shi S; Li M; Luo X; Liu M; Yang K; Zhang J; Song F; Tian J
    BMC Med; 2020 Jun; 18(1):120. PubMed ID: 32475340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing moderation in network meta-analysis with individual participant data.
    Dagne GA; Brown CH; Howe G; Kellam SG; Liu L
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2485-502. PubMed ID: 26841367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the use of aggregate data and various methods of integrating individual patient data to network meta-analysis and its application to first-line ART.
    Kanters S; Karim ME; Thorlund K; Anis AH; Zoratti M; Bansback N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33784981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When does the use of individual patient data in network meta-analysis make a difference? A simulation study.
    Kanters S; Karim ME; Thorlund K; Anis A; Bansback N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):21. PubMed ID: 33435879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework for identifying treatment-covariate interactions in individual participant data network meta-analysis.
    Freeman SC; Fisher D; Tierney JF; Carpenter JR
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):393-407. PubMed ID: 29737630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of individual patient data in a network meta-analysis: An investigation into parameter estimation and model selection.
    Leahy J; O'Leary A; Afdhal N; Gray E; Milligan S; Wehmeyer MH; Walsh C
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):441-469. PubMed ID: 29923679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data.
    Veroniki AA; Straus SE; Soobiah C; Elliott MJ; Tricco AC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():47. PubMed ID: 27116943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the impact of imputations for missing participant outcome data in a network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM; Higgins JP; Cipriani A; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 23321265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review.
    Veroniki AA; Soobiah C; Tricco AC; Elliott MJ; Straus SE
    BMJ Open; 2015 Apr; 5(4):e007103. PubMed ID: 25926144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Penalized Poisson model for network meta-analysis of individual patient time-to-event data.
    Ollier E; Blanchard P; Le Teuff G; Michiels S
    Stat Med; 2022 Jan; 41(2):340-355. PubMed ID: 34710951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian network meta-analysis methods for combining individual participant data and aggregate data from single arm trials and randomised controlled trials.
    Singh J; Gsteiger S; Wheaton L; Riley RD; Abrams KR; Gillies CL; Bujkiewicz S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):186. PubMed ID: 35818035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.
    Noma H; Maruo K; Gosho M; Levine SZ; Goldberg Y; Leucht S; Furukawa TA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30764757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthesizing cross-design evidence and cross-format data using network meta-regression.
    Hamza T; Chalkou K; Pellegrini F; Kuhle J; Benkert P; Lorscheider J; Zecca C; Iglesias-Urrutia CP; Manca A; Furukawa TA; Cipriani A; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Mar; 14(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 36625736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using individual participant data to improve network meta-analysis projects.
    Riley RD; Dias S; Donegan S; Tierney JF; Stewart LA; Efthimiou O; Phillippo DM
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Jun; 28(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 35948411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Network Meta-Analysis.
    Watt J; Del Giovane C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2345():187-201. PubMed ID: 34550592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjustment for reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant trials.
    Trinquart L; Chatellier G; Ravaud P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Sep; 12():150. PubMed ID: 23016799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant placebo-controlled trials.
    Trinquart L; Abbé A; Ravaud P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35219. PubMed ID: 22536359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.