These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27487844)

  • 1. Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests to a common gold standard: A generalized linear mixed model approach.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1410-1421. PubMed ID: 27487844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests-A new approach based on copulas.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):739-748. PubMed ID: 29193212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.
    Ma X; Nie L; Cole SR; Chu H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1596-619. PubMed ID: 23804970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A D-vine copula mixed model for joint meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic tests.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3286-3300. PubMed ID: 30255733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.
    Schlattmann P; Verba M; Dewey M; Walther M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25441701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A vine copula mixed effect model for trivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2270-2286. PubMed ID: 26265766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves with flexible parametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):301-313. PubMed ID: 31953903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A population-averaged approach to diagnostic test meta-analysis.
    Preisser JS; Inan G; Powers JM; Chu H
    Biom J; 2019 Jan; 61(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 30370548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX.
    Menke J
    Methods Inf Med; 2010; 49(1):54-62, 62-4. PubMed ID: 19936437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves using bivariate time-to-event models for interval-censored data.
    Hoyer A; Hirt S; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 29052956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves: Additional flexibility by using semiparametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):528-538. PubMed ID: 31231986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Kester AD; Buntinx F
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 11059476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 32022315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using generalized linear mixed models.
    Chu H; Guo H; Zhou Y
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 19959794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of bivariate, multivariate random-effects, and Poisson correlated gamma-frailty models to meta-analyze individual patient data of ordinal scale diagnostic tests.
    Simoneau G; Levis B; Cuijpers P; Ioannidis JPA; Patten SB; Shrier I; Bombardier CH; de Lima Osório F; Fann JR; Gjerdingen D; Lamers F; Lotrakul M; Löwe B; Shaaban J; Stafford L; van Weert HCPM; Whooley MA; Wittkampf KA; Yeung AS; Thombs BD; Benedetti A
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1317-1338. PubMed ID: 28692782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid copula mixed models for combining case-control and cohort studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2540-2553. PubMed ID: 29984634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Evaluation of Bivariate Mixed Models in Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies with SAS, Stata and R.
    Vogelgesang F; Schlattmann P; Dewey M
    Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):111-119. PubMed ID: 29719917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
    Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.