323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27487868)
1. Technical Note: Dosimetric effects of couch position variability on treatment plan quality with an MRI-guided Co-60 radiation therapy machine.
Chow PE; Thomas DH; Agazaryan N; Cao M; Low DA; Yang Y; Steinberg ML; Lee P; Lamb JM
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4514. PubMed ID: 27487868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-Dimensional Dosimetric Validation of a Magnetic Resonance Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy System.
Rankine LJ; Mein S; Cai B; Curcuru A; Juang T; Miles D; Mutic S; Wang Y; Oldham M; Li HH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Apr; 97(5):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 28332995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Remote Cherenkov imaging-based quality assurance of a magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy system.
Andreozzi JM; Mooney KE; Brůža P; Curcuru A; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW; Green O
Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2647-2659. PubMed ID: 29663429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized triplet beam orientation optimization for MRI-guided Co-60 radiotherapy.
Nguyen D; Thomas D; Cao M; O'Connor D; Lamb J; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5667. PubMed ID: 27782726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans Using a ⁶⁰Co Magnetic Resonance Image Guidance Radiation Therapy System.
Wooten HO; Green O; Yang M; DeWees T; Kashani R; Olsen J; Michalski J; Yang D; Tanderup K; Hu Y; Li HH; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 26104932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eliminating Daily Shifts, Tattoos, and Skin Marks: Streamlining Isocenter Localization With Treatment Plan Embedded Couch Values for External Beam Radiation Therapy.
Sueyoshi M; Olch AJ; Liu KX; Chlebik A; Clark D; Wong KK
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):e110-e117. PubMed ID: 30355524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing patient posture variability using the predicted couch position.
de Kruijf WJ; Martens RJ
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):218-21. PubMed ID: 25619554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric feasibility of real-time MRI-guided proton therapy.
Moteabbed M; Schuemann J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111713. PubMed ID: 25370627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development and verification of a highly accurate collision prediction model for automated noncoplanar plan delivery.
Yu VY; Tran A; Nguyen D; Cao M; Ruan D; Low DA; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6457-67. PubMed ID: 26520735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-specific quality assurance for the delivery of (60)Co intensity modulated radiation therapy subject to a 0.35-T lateral magnetic field.
Li HH; Rodriguez VL; Green OL; Hu Y; Kashani R; Wooten HO; Yang D; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25442343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling treatment couches in the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Especially important for arc therapy.
Duggar WN; Nguyen A; Stanford J; Morris B; Yang CC
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 26342567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification and comparison the dosimetric impact of two treatment couch model in VMAT.
Zhang R; Gao Y; Bai W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 29094802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 1.5 T transverse magnetic field in radiotherapy of rectal cancer: Impact on the dose distribution.
Uilkema S; van der Heide U; Sonke JJ; Moreau M; van Triest B; Nijkamp J
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7182-9. PubMed ID: 26632072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.
Mayyas E; Chetty IJ; Chetvertkov M; Wen N; Neicu T; Nurushev T; Ren L; Lu M; Stricker H; Pradhan D; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041707. PubMed ID: 23556877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying the performance of in vivo portal dosimetry in detecting four types of treatment parameter variations.
Bojechko C; Ford EC
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6912-8. PubMed ID: 26632047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards integration of PET/MR hybrid imaging into radiation therapy treatment planning.
Paulus DH; Thorwath D; Schmidt H; Quick HH
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):072505. PubMed ID: 24989408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric effects of the kV based image-guided radiation therapy of prone breast external beam radiation: Towards the optimized imaging frequency.
Xu H; Lee SW; Guerrero M; Yi BY; Chen S; Becker SJ; Chung H; Cheston SB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):212-219. PubMed ID: 30550644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Monte Carlo study of the effect of an ultrasound transducer on surface dose during intrafraction motion imaging for external beam radiation therapy.
Martyn M; O'Shea TP; Harris E; Bamber J; Gilroy S; Foley MJ
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5020-5033. PubMed ID: 28688115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose calculation platform and its application toward validating an MRI-guided radiation therapy beam model.
Wang Y; Mazur TR; Green O; Hu Y; Li H; Rodriguez V; Wooten HO; Yang D; Zhao T; Mutic S; Li HH
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4040. PubMed ID: 27370123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
