247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27487906)
1. Delivered dose uncertainty analysis at the tumor apex for ocular brachytherapy.
Morrison H; Menon G; Larocque MP; Jans HS; Weis E; Sloboda RS
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4891. PubMed ID: 27487906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying the dosimetric influences of radiation coverage and brachytherapy implant placement uncertainty on eye plaque size selection.
Gagne NL; Rivard MJ
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(5):508-20. PubMed ID: 23466357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating the dosimetric impact of seed location uncertainties in Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study-based eye plaques.
Johnson JE; Deufel CL; Furutani KM
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(5):661-8. PubMed ID: 27475484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and dosimetric considerations of a modified COMS plaque: the reusable "seed-guide" insert.
Astrahan MA; Szechter A; Finger PT
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2706-16. PubMed ID: 16193802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetry of (125)I and (103)Pd COMS eye plaques for intraocular tumors: report of Task Group 129 by the AAPM and ABS.
Chiu-Tsao ST; Astrahan MA; Finger PT; Followill DS; Meigooni AS; Melhus CS; Mourtada F; Napolitano ME; Nath R; Rivard MJ; Rogers DW; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6161-84. PubMed ID: 23039655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A practical approach to estimating optic disc dose and macula dose without treatment planning in ocular brachytherapy using
Lee YC; Lin SC; Kim Y
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Nov; 13(1):221. PubMed ID: 30424782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of material heterogeneity dosimetric effects using radiochromic film for COMS eye plaques loaded with (125)I seeds (model I25.S16).
Acar H; Chiu-Tsao ST; Ozbay I; Kemikler G; Tuncer S
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011708. PubMed ID: 23298078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiobiology for eye plaque brachytherapy and evaluation of implant duration and radionuclide choice using an objective function.
Gagne NL; Leonard KL; Rivard MJ
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3332-42. PubMed ID: 22755715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo simulation of COMS ophthalmic applicators loaded with Bebig I25.S16 seeds and comparison with planning system predictions.
Miras H; Terrón JA; Lallena AM
Phys Med; 2013 Nov; 29(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 22858007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EyeDose: An open-source tool for using published Monte Carlo results to estimate the radiation dose delivered to the tumor and critical ocular structures for
Deufel CL; McCauley Cutsinger S; Corbin KS; Dalvin LA; Petersen IA
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(1):189-199. PubMed ID: 33187821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental validation of a new COMS-like 24 mm eye plaque for the treatment of large ocular melanoma tumors.
McCauley Cutsinger S; Forsman R; Corner S; Deufel CL
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(6):890-897. PubMed ID: 31444131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model-based dose calculations for COMS eye plaque brachytherapy using an anatomically realistic eye phantom.
Lesperance M; Inglis-Whalen M; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021717. PubMed ID: 24506608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric benefit of a new ophthalmic radiation plaque.
Marwaha G; Wilkinson A; Bena J; Macklis R; Singh AD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Dec; 84(5):1226-30. PubMed ID: 22658440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison of circular Eye Physics and Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study plaques to treat uveal melanoma.
Dean MK; Studenski MT; Paez-Escamilla MA; Walter SD; Kwon D; Markoe AM; Harbour JW; Samuels SE
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):404-410. PubMed ID: 30797699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. I-125 ROPES eye plaque dosimetry: validation of a commercial 3D ophthalmic brachytherapy treatment planning system and independent dose calculation software with GafChromic® EBT3 films.
Poder J; Corde S
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121709. PubMed ID: 24320495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 16 mm OSU-Nag and COMS eye plaques.
Zhang H; Davidorf F; Qi Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 May; 13(3):3632. PubMed ID: 22584165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric verification of a dedicated 3D treatment planning system for episcleral plaque therapy.
Knutsen S; Hafslund R; Monge OR; Valen H; Muren LP; Rekstad BL; Krohn J; Dahl O
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1159-66. PubMed ID: 11704341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo dosimetry for 103Pd, 125I, and 131Cs ocular brachytherapy with various plaque models using an eye phantom.
Lesperance M; Martinov M; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031706. PubMed ID: 24593710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comprehensive dosimetric comparison between (131)Cs and (125)I brachytherapy sources for COMS eye plaque implant.
Zhang H; Martin D; Chiu-Tsao ST; Meigooni A; Thomadsen BR
Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(4):362-72. PubMed ID: 20116342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multidimensional dosimetry of ¹⁰⁶Ru eye plaques using EBT3 films and its impact on treatment planning.
Heilemann G; Nesvacil N; Blaickner M; Kostiukhina N; Georg D
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5798-808. PubMed ID: 26429254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
