These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27488059)

  • 1. Carryover Effects in Sibling Comparison Designs.
    Sjölander A; Frisell T; Kuja-Halkola R; Öberg S; Zetterqvist J
    Epidemiology; 2016 Nov; 27(6):852-8. PubMed ID: 27488059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confounders, Mediators, or Colliders: What Types of Shared Covariates Does a Sibling Comparison Design Control For?
    Sjölander A; Zetterqvist J
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jul; 28(4):540-547. PubMed ID: 28575894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sibling comparison designs: bias from non-shared confounders and measurement error.
    Frisell T; Öberg S; Kuja-Halkola R; Sjölander A
    Epidemiology; 2012 Sep; 23(5):713-20. PubMed ID: 22781362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Is the Causal Interpretation of Sibling Comparison Designs?
    Petersen AH; Lange T
    Epidemiology; 2020 Jan; 31(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 31651661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familial confounding or measurement error? How to interpret findings from sibling and co-twin control studies.
    Gustavson K; Torvik FA; Davey Smith G; Røysamb E; Eilertsen EM
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 39(6):587-603. PubMed ID: 38879863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining Mendelian randomization with the sibling comparison design.
    Sjölander A; Frisell T; Öberg S; Wang Y; Hägg S
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):731-755. PubMed ID: 38073579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
    le Cessie S
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An overview of confounding. Part 2: how to identify it and special situations.
    Howards PP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):400-406. PubMed ID: 29341101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias magnification in ecologic studies: a methodological investigation.
    Webster TF
    Environ Health; 2007 Jul; 6():17. PubMed ID: 17615079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the impact of non-shared unmeasured confounding on the sibling comparison analysis.
    Esen BÖ; Ehrenstein V; Petersen I; Sørensen HT; Pedersen L
    Int J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 53(1):. PubMed ID: 38110565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal design strategies for sibling studies with binary exposures.
    Li Z; McKeague IW; Lumey LH
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 25153242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A sibling-augmented case-only approach for assessing multiplicative gene-environment interactions.
    Weinberg CR; Shi M; Umbach DM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 174(10):1183-9. PubMed ID: 22021562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.
    Little RJ; Rubin DB
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2000; 21():121-45. PubMed ID: 10884949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commentary: dealing with measurement error: multiple imputation or regression calibration?
    White IR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1081-2. PubMed ID: 16847023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Translational Epidemiologic Approaches to Understanding the Consequences of Early-Life Exposures.
    D'Onofrio BM; Class QA; Rickert ME; Sujan AC; Larsson H; Kuja-Halkola R; Sjölander A; Almqvist C; Lichtenstein P; Oberg AS
    Behav Genet; 2016 May; 46(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 26590988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Trend-in-trend Research Design for Causal Inference.
    Ji X; Small DS; Leonard CE; Hennessy S
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jul; 28(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 27775954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias.
    Richiardi L; Bellocco R; Zugna D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 42(5):1511-9. PubMed ID: 24019424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Collaborative, pooled and harmonized study designs for epidemiologic research: challenges and opportunities.
    Lesko CR; Jacobson LP; Althoff KN; Abraham AG; Gange SJ; Moore RD; Modur S; Lau B
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 47(2):654-668. PubMed ID: 29438495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.