These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27489171)

  • 1. 'I didn't see that coming': simulated visual fields and driving hazard perception test performance.
    Glen FC; Smith ND; Jones L; Crabb DP
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Sep; 99(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 27489171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of superior and inferior visual field loss on hazard detection in a computer-based driving test.
    Glen FC; Smith ND; Crabb DP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 99(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25425712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.
    Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 23329309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Driving with Glaucoma: Task Performance and Gaze Movements.
    Kübler TC; Kasneci E; Rosenstiel W; Heister M; Aehling K; Nagel K; Schiefer U; Papageorgiou E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1037-46. PubMed ID: 26501733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of simulated cataracts on drivers' hazard perception ability.
    Marrington SA; Horswill MS; Wood JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1121-7. PubMed ID: 19050466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing visual fields for driving in patients with paracentral scotomata.
    Chisholm CM; Rauscher FG; Crabb DC; Davies LN; Dunne MC; Edgar DF; Harlow JA; James-Galton M; Petzold A; Plant GT; Viswanathan AC; Underwood GJ; Barbur JL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 17962396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driving with central field loss III: vehicle control.
    Bronstad PM; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E; Bowers AR
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Sep; 99(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27452786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driving with binocular visual field loss? A study on a supervised on-road parcours with simultaneous eye and head tracking.
    Kasneci E; Sippel K; Aehling K; Heister M; Rosenstiel W; Schiefer U; Papageorgiou E
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87470. PubMed ID: 24523869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring the Useful Field of View During Simulated Driving With Gaze-Contingent Displays.
    Gaspar JG; Ward N; Neider MB; Crowell J; Carbonari R; Kaczmarski H; Ringer RV; Johnson AP; Kramer AF; Loschky LC
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):630-41. PubMed ID: 27091370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hazard detection with a monocular bioptic telescope.
    Doherty AL; Peli E; Luo G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):530-9. PubMed ID: 26303448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Perimetry findings and driving performance. "How much visual field" does a motorist need?].
    Schiefer U; Hofer R; Vischer PM; Wilhelm H
    Ophthalmologe; 2000 Jul; 97(7):491-7. PubMed ID: 10959186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of visual impairment on driving.
    Wood JM; Troutbeck R
    Hum Factors; 1994 Sep; 36(3):476-87. PubMed ID: 7989052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of driving fitness in patients with visual impairment to understand the elevated risk of motor vehicle accidents.
    Kunimatsu-Sanuki S; Iwase A; Araie M; Aoki Y; Hara T; Nakazawa T; Yamaguchi T; Ono H; Sanuki T; Itoh M
    BMJ Open; 2015 Feb; 5(2):e006379. PubMed ID: 25724982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Older Adult Multitasking Performance Using a Gaze-Contingent Useful Field of View.
    Ward N; Gaspar JG; Neider MB; Crowell J; Carbonari R; Kaczmarski H; Ringer RV; Johnson AP; Loschky LC; Kramer AF
    Hum Factors; 2018 Mar; 60(2):236-247. PubMed ID: 29241017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
    Bronstad PM; Albu A; Bowers AR; Goldstein R; Peli E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136517. PubMed ID: 26332315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current licensing authority standards for peripheral visual field and safe on-road senior aged automobile driving performance.
    Silveira S; Jolly N; Heard R; Clunas NJ; Kay L
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(7):612-20. PubMed ID: 17894680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of the Spanish Hazard Perception Test.
    Castro C; Padilla JL; Roca J; Benítez I; García-Fernández P; Estévez B; López-Ramón MF; Crundall D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):817-26. PubMed ID: 24433083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glaucoma and fitness to drive: using binocular visual fields to predict a milestone to blindness.
    Owen VM; Crabb DP; White ET; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath DF; Hitchings RA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2449-55. PubMed ID: 18515585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual field defects due to spectacle frames: their prediction and relationship to UK driving standards.
    Steel SE; Mackie SW; Walsh G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 8762769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring eye movements in patients with glaucoma when viewing a driving scene.
    Crabb DP; Smith ND; Rauscher FG; Chisholm CM; Barbur JL; Edgar DF; Garway-Heath DF
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9710. PubMed ID: 20300522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.