BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

739 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27489955)

  • 1. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
    Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
    Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis.
    Pei S; Liu T; Ren X; Li W; Chen C; Xie Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32698196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to reduce ancestry related germline false positives in tumor only somatic variant calling.
    Halperin RF; Carpten JD; Manojlovic Z; Aldrich J; Keats J; Byron S; Liang WS; Russell M; Enriquez D; Claasen A; Cherni I; Awuah B; Oppong J; Wicha MS; Newman LA; Jaigge E; Kim S; Craig DW
    BMC Med Genomics; 2017 Oct; 10(1):61. PubMed ID: 29052513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comprehensive benchmarking of SNV callers for highly admixed tumor data.
    Bohnert R; Vivas S; Jansen G
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186175. PubMed ID: 29020110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using VarScan 2 for Germline Variant Calling and Somatic Mutation Detection.
    Koboldt DC; Larson DE; Wilson RK
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2013 Dec; 44():15.4.1-17. PubMed ID: 25553206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants.
    Cacheiro P; Ordóñez-Ugalde A; Quintáns B; Piñeiro-Hermida S; Amigo J; García-Murias M; Pascual-Pascual SI; Grandas F; Arpa J; Carracedo A; Sobrido MJ
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2017 Jun; 21(3):303-313. PubMed ID: 28290094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative assessments of indel annotations in healthy and cancer genomes with next-generation sequencing data.
    Chen J; Guo JT
    BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Nov; 13(1):170. PubMed ID: 33167946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing a few SNP calling algorithms using low-coverage sequencing data.
    Yu X; Sun S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 14():274. PubMed ID: 24044377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
    Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimized detection of insertions/deletions (INDELs) in whole-exome sequencing data.
    Kim BY; Park JH; Jo HY; Koo SK; Park MH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182272. PubMed ID: 28792971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data.
    Wang Q; Kotoula V; Hsu PC; Papadopoulou K; Ho JWK; Fountzilas G; Giannoulatou E
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):181. PubMed ID: 31874647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
    Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. mInDel: a high-throughput and efficient pipeline for genome-wide InDel marker development.
    Lv Y; Liu Y; Zhao H
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Apr; 17():290. PubMed ID: 27079510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels.
    Zanti M; Michailidou K; Loizidou MA; Machattou C; Pirpa P; Christodoulou K; Spyrou GM; Kyriacou K; Hadjisavvas A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):218. PubMed ID: 33910496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indel detection from RNA-seq data: tool evaluation and strategies for accurate detection of actionable mutations.
    Sun Z; Bhagwate A; Prodduturi N; Yang P; Kocher JA
    Brief Bioinform; 2017 Nov; 18(6):973-983. PubMed ID: 27473065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tool evaluation for the detection of variably sized indels from next generation whole genome and targeted sequencing data.
    Wang N; Lysenkov V; Orte K; Kairisto V; Aakko J; Khan S; Elo LL
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Feb; 18(2):e1009269. PubMed ID: 35176018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intersect-then-combine approach: improving the performance of somatic variant calling in whole exome sequencing data using multiple aligners and callers.
    Callari M; Sammut SJ; De Mattos-Arruda L; Bruna A; Rueda OM; Chin SF; Caldas C
    Genome Med; 2017 Apr; 9(1):35. PubMed ID: 28420412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
    Chang TC; Xu K; Cheng Z; Wu G
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1361():37-54. PubMed ID: 35230682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.