These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27490859)

  • 21. Prediction models of bit errors for NAND flash memory using 200 days of measured data.
    Wei D; Qiao L; Chen X; Feng H; Peng X
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2019 Jun; 90(6):064702. PubMed ID: 31255025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The prediction of the flash point for binary aqueous-organic solutions.
    Liaw HJ; Chiu YY
    J Hazard Mater; 2003 Jul; 101(2):83-106. PubMed ID: 12927728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. QSPR analysis of flash points.
    Katritzky AR; Petrukhin R; Jain R; Karelson M
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(6):1521-30. PubMed ID: 11749578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. QSPR modeling of flash points: an update.
    Katritzky AR; Stoyanova-Slavova IB; Dobchev DA; Karelson M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Sep; 26(2):529-36. PubMed ID: 17532242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds.
    Shen M; Béguin C; Golbraikh A; Stables JP; Kohn H; Tropsha A
    J Med Chem; 2004 Apr; 47(9):2356-64. PubMed ID: 15084134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact sensitivities of energetic materials: Exploring the limitations of a model based only on structural formulas.
    Mathieu D; Alaime T
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Nov; 62():81-86. PubMed ID: 26386555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Molecular parameters responsible for the melting point of 1,2,3-diazaborine compounds.
    Johnson-Restrepo B; Pacheco-Londoño L; Olivero-Verbel J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1513-9. PubMed ID: 14502485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Why are some properties more difficult to predict than others? A study of QSPR models of solubility, melting point, and Log P.
    Hughes LD; Palmer DS; Nigsch F; Mitchell JB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jan; 48(1):220-32. PubMed ID: 18186622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing the reliability of a QSAR model's predictions.
    He L; Jurs PC
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Jun; 23(6):503-23. PubMed ID: 15896992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of quantum chemical approximations to environmental problems: prediction of water solubility for nitro compounds.
    Kholod YA; Muratov EN; Gorb LG; Hill FC; Artemenko AG; Kuz'min VE; Qasim M; Leszczynski J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9208-15. PubMed ID: 20000511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A novel QSPR model for prediction of lower flammability limits of organic compounds based on support vector machine.
    Pan Y; Jiang J; Wang R; Cao H; Cui Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 168(2-3):962-9. PubMed ID: 19329246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inductive modeling of physico-chemical properties: flash point of alkanes.
    Mathieu D
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jul; 179(1-3):1161-4. PubMed ID: 20381960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Revisiting the general solubility equation: in silico prediction of aqueous solubility incorporating the effect of topographical polar surface area.
    Ali J; Camilleri P; Brown MB; Hutt AJ; Kirton SB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 22196228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Merging applicability domains for in silico assessment of chemical mutagenicity.
    Liu R; Wallqvist A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 24494696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Extrapolative prediction using physically-based QSAR.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Feb; 30(2):127-52. PubMed ID: 26860112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Filling environmental data gaps with QSPR for ionic liquids: Modeling n-octanol/water coefficient.
    Rybinska A; Sosnowska A; Grzonkowska M; Barycki M; Puzyn T
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 Feb; 303():137-44. PubMed ID: 26530890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Flash Points of Secondary Alcohol and n-Alkane Mixtures.
    Esina ZN; Miroshnikov AM; Korchuganova MR
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Nov; 119(46):14697-704. PubMed ID: 26491811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction of aqueous solubility of a diverse set of compounds using quantitative structure-property relationships.
    Cheng A; Merz KM
    J Med Chem; 2003 Aug; 46(17):3572-80. PubMed ID: 12904062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decreasing the uncertainty of classical laser flash analysis using numerical algorithms robust to noise and systematic errors.
    Lunev A; Heymer R
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2020 Jun; 91(6):064902. PubMed ID: 32611034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of new bioactive molecules using a Bayesian belief network.
    Abdo A; Leclère V; Jacques P; Salim N; Pupin M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 24392938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.